rs1363405

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_022455.5(NSD1):​c.1482C>T​(p.Cys494Cys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.244 in 1,613,566 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 60,164 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.36 ( 13160 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.23 ( 47004 hom. )

Consequence

NSD1
NM_022455.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.98

Publications

37 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
NSD1 (HGNC:14234): (nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 1) This gene encodes a protein containing a SET domain, 2 LXXLL motifs, 3 nuclear translocation signals (NLSs), 4 plant homeodomain (PHD) finger regions, and a proline-rich region. The encoded protein enhances androgen receptor (AR) transactivation, and this enhancement can be increased further in the presence of other androgen receptor associated coregulators. This protein may act as a nucleus-localized, basic transcriptional factor and also as a bifunctional transcriptional regulator. Mutations of this gene have been associated with Sotos syndrome and Weaver syndrome. One version of childhood acute myeloid leukemia is the result of a cryptic translocation with the breakpoints occurring within nuclear receptor-binding Su-var, enhancer of zeste, and trithorax domain protein 1 on chromosome 5 and nucleoporin, 98-kd on chromosome 11. Multiple transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2018]
NSD1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome due to NSD1 mutation
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • Sotos syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P, ClinGen
  • Sotos syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.46).
BP6
Variant 5-177209881-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-177209881-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 96035.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.98 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.674 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NSD1NM_022455.5 linkc.1482C>T p.Cys494Cys synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 23 ENST00000439151.7 NP_071900.2 Q96L73-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NSD1ENST00000439151.7 linkc.1482C>T p.Cys494Cys synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 23 1 NM_022455.5 ENSP00000395929.2 Q96L73-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.360
AC:
54694
AN:
151792
Hom.:
13139
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.681
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0989
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.285
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.201
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.528
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.364
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.247
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.278
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.200
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.315
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.293
AC:
73412
AN:
250886
AF XY:
0.283
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.696
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.301
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.205
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.537
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.248
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.198
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.260
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.232
AC:
339226
AN:
1461656
Hom.:
47004
Cov.:
40
AF XY:
0.234
AC XY:
170003
AN XY:
727142
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.693
AC:
23208
AN:
33476
American (AMR)
AF:
0.297
AC:
13272
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.207
AC:
5417
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.522
AC:
20703
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.342
AC:
29507
AN:
86254
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.251
AC:
13388
AN:
53396
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.312
AC:
1798
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.194
AC:
215807
AN:
1111820
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.267
AC:
16126
AN:
60386
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.476
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
15036
30072
45107
60143
75179
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
7968
15936
23904
31872
39840
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.361
AC:
54774
AN:
151910
Hom.:
13160
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.362
AC XY:
26848
AN XY:
74228
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.681
AC:
28202
AN:
41436
American (AMR)
AF:
0.285
AC:
4350
AN:
15268
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.201
AC:
699
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.527
AC:
2720
AN:
5160
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.364
AC:
1750
AN:
4810
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.247
AC:
2602
AN:
10534
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.282
AC:
83
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.200
AC:
13614
AN:
67924
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.316
AC:
664
AN:
2102
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.505
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1499
2998
4496
5995
7494
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
492
984
1476
1968
2460
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.251
Hom.:
10088
Bravo
AF:
0.375
Asia WGS
AF:
0.473
AC:
1640
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.196
EpiControl
AF:
0.187

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Feb 08, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 10, 2013
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Mar 19, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Sotos syndrome Benign:1
Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.46
CADD
Benign
11
DANN
Benign
0.68
PhyloP100
2.0
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1363405; hg19: chr5-176636882; COSMIC: COSV61770800; COSMIC: COSV61770800; API