rs1370275

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The ENST00000539156.5(FAH):​n.2097G>A variant causes a non coding transcript exon change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.512 in 1,604,670 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 215,209 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.46 ( 17032 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.52 ( 198177 hom. )

Consequence

FAH
ENST00000539156.5 non_coding_transcript_exon

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.70

Publications

12 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
FAH (HGNC:3579): (fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase) Predicted to enable fumarylacetoacetase activity. Predicted to be involved in L-phenylalanine catabolic process; homogentisate catabolic process; and tyrosine catabolic process. Predicted to act upstream of or within arginine catabolic process. Located in extracellular exosome. Implicated in tyrosinemia type I. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
FAH Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • tyrosinemia type I
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Myriad Women’s Health, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, G2P, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-1.04).
BP6
Variant 15-80158047-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-80158047-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 92446.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.739 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
FAHNM_000137.4 linkc.82-13G>A intron_variant Intron 1 of 13 ENST00000561421.6 NP_000128.1 P16930-1A0A384P5L6
FAHNM_001374377.1 linkc.82-13G>A intron_variant Intron 2 of 14 NP_001361306.1
FAHNM_001374380.1 linkc.82-13G>A intron_variant Intron 2 of 14 NP_001361309.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
FAHENST00000561421.6 linkc.82-13G>A intron_variant Intron 1 of 13 1 NM_000137.4 ENSP00000453347.2 P16930-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.461
AC:
69992
AN:
151768
Hom.:
17037
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.318
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.515
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.439
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.548
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.758
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.590
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.450
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.592
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.517
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.492
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.511
AC:
128519
AN:
251430
AF XY:
0.522
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.312
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.390
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.553
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.762
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.458
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.516
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.498
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.517
AC:
751629
AN:
1452784
Hom.:
198177
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.521
AC XY:
376826
AN XY:
723388
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.301
AC:
10009
AN:
33272
American (AMR)
AF:
0.397
AC:
17759
AN:
44712
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.550
AC:
14338
AN:
26092
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.769
AC:
30482
AN:
39658
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.609
AC:
52441
AN:
86088
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.463
AC:
24740
AN:
53410
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.579
AC:
3293
AN:
5686
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.514
AC:
567030
AN:
1103776
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.525
AC:
31537
AN:
60090
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.497
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
17420
34840
52261
69681
87101
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
16344
32688
49032
65376
81720
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.461
AC:
70017
AN:
151886
Hom.:
17032
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.461
AC XY:
34185
AN XY:
74222
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.318
AC:
13171
AN:
41432
American (AMR)
AF:
0.438
AC:
6686
AN:
15254
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.548
AC:
1901
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.759
AC:
3901
AN:
5142
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.589
AC:
2836
AN:
4812
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.450
AC:
4744
AN:
10532
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.592
AC:
174
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.517
AC:
35100
AN:
67930
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.491
AC:
1036
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1844
3687
5531
7374
9218
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
652
1304
1956
2608
3260
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.508
Hom.:
62893
Bravo
AF:
0.449
Asia WGS
AF:
0.606
AC:
2106
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Tyrosinemia type I Benign:5
-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 26, 2019
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 01, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not specified Benign:4
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 25, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-1.0
CADD
Benign
0.0030
DANN
Benign
0.27
PhyloP100
-4.7
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1370275; hg19: chr15-80450389; API