Menu
GeneBe

rs13749

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001376.5(DYNC1H1):ā€‹c.13080T>Cā€‹(p.Thr4360=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.193 in 1,613,124 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 38,483 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.29 ( 9246 hom., cov: 29)
Exomes š‘“: 0.18 ( 29237 hom. )

Consequence

DYNC1H1
NM_001376.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.08
Variant links:
Genes affected
DYNC1H1 (HGNC:2961): (dynein cytoplasmic 1 heavy chain 1) Dyneins are a group of microtubule-activated ATPases that function as molecular motors. They are divided into two subgroups of axonemal and cytoplasmic dyneins. The cytoplasmic dyneins function in intracellular motility, including retrograde axonal transport, protein sorting, organelle movement, and spindle dynamics. Molecules of conventional cytoplasmic dynein are comprised of 2 heavy chain polypeptides and a number of intermediate and light chains.This gene encodes a member of the cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain family. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).
BP6
Variant 14-102047890-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-102047890-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 128929.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr14-102047890-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.08 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.584 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DYNC1H1NM_001376.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.13080T>C p.Thr4360= synonymous_variant 73/78 ENST00000360184.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DYNC1H1ENST00000360184.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.13080T>C p.Thr4360= synonymous_variant 73/781 NM_001376.5 P1
ENST00000553701.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.346+2555A>G intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.294
AC:
44567
AN:
151360
Hom.:
9216
Cov.:
29
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.590
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0614
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.256
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.231
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.274
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.267
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.128
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.297
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.161
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.287
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.225
AC:
56385
AN:
251050
Hom.:
7987
AF XY:
0.217
AC XY:
29479
AN XY:
135758
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.597
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.249
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.247
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.288
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.254
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.124
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.163
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.213
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.183
AC:
267168
AN:
1461646
Hom.:
29237
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.184
AC XY:
133540
AN XY:
727132
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.616
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.255
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.243
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.270
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.256
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.131
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.157
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.212
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.295
AC:
44657
AN:
151478
Hom.:
9246
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.290
AC XY:
21458
AN XY:
74068
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.590
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.256
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.231
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.275
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.269
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.128
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.161
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.285
Alfa
AF:
0.201
Hom.:
6950
Bravo
AF:
0.319
Asia WGS
AF:
0.281
AC:
975
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.178
EpiControl
AF:
0.178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoApr 25, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 28, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 30, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Autosomal dominant childhood-onset proximal spinal muscular atrophy without contractures Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 30, 2021- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre-- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJan 08, 2016This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 13 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 30, 2021- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.81
CADD
Benign
0.016
DANN
Benign
0.48
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs13749; hg19: chr14-102514227; COSMIC: COSV64135226; COSMIC: COSV64135226; API