Menu
GeneBe

rs1375360857

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBS2_Supporting

The NM_004360.5(CDH1):​c.29C>A​(p.Ala10Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000822 in 1,337,648 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A10T) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000082 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 missense

Scores

5
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.309
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.232885).
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 11 AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CDH1NM_004360.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.29C>A p.Ala10Glu missense_variant 1/16 ENST00000261769.10
CDH1NM_001317184.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.29C>A p.Ala10Glu missense_variant 1/15
CDH1NM_001317185.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-1587C>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/16
CDH1NM_001317186.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-1791C>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/15

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CDH1ENST00000261769.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.29C>A p.Ala10Glu missense_variant 1/161 NM_004360.5 P1P12830-1
CDH1ENST00000422392.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.29C>A p.Ala10Glu missense_variant 1/151 P12830-2
CDH1ENST00000566612.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.29C>A p.Ala10Glu missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 1/151
CDH1ENST00000566510.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.29C>A p.Ala10Glu missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 1/155

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
33
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000822
AC:
11
AN:
1337648
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.0000121
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
661386
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000329
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000865
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000178
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
33
Bravo
AF:
0.0000113

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Mar 09, 2018- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 24, 2020Not observed in large population cohorts (Lek 2016); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsJul 02, 2018- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 06, 2024This sequence change replaces alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, with glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, at codon 10 of the CDH1 protein (p.Ala10Glu). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CDH1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 584912). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMay 06, 2024This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.42
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.15
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.45
CADD
Benign
16
DANN
Uncertain
0.98
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.47
T;T;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.85
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.93
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.037
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.74
T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.19
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.23
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.1
M;.;.;.;M
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.41
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.4
N;.;.;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.074
Sift
Benign
0.10
T;.;.;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.41
T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.36
B;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.28
MutPred
0.61
Gain of disorder (P = 0.0215);Gain of disorder (P = 0.0215);Gain of disorder (P = 0.0215);Gain of disorder (P = 0.0215);Gain of disorder (P = 0.0215);
MVP
0.75
MPC
0.54
ClinPred
0.19
T
GERP RS
1.9
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.0
Varity_R
0.14
gMVP
0.57

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1375360857; hg19: chr16-68771347; API