rs137853962

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 1P and 3B. BP7PP1BP4BP2

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The NM_000527.5(LDLR):c.1875C>T (p.Asn625=) variant is classified as Likely Benign for Familial Hypercholesterolemia by applying evidence codes PP1, BP2, BP4, and BP7 as defined by the ClinGen Familial Hypercholesterolemia Expert Panel LDLR-specific variant curation guidelines (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2021.09.012). Variant has 3 supporting evidence codes towards Benign, enough to classify as Likely benign, and only 1 supporting evidence codes towards Pathogenic. The Benign criteria overwhelms the Pathogenic criteria, so we are confident in classifying this variant as Likely benign.The supporting evidence is as follows: PP1: Variant segregates with FH phenotype in 2 informative meioses in 1 families from Cardiovascular Research Group, Instituto Nacional de Saude Doutor Ricardo Jorge. So PP1 is met. BP2: 1 individual from Cardiovascular Research Group,Instituto Nacional de Saude Doutor Ricardo Jorge with LDLR c.1598G>A. Phenotype LDL 168mg/dl under statins - Htz phenotype, c.1598G>A - Pathogenic by these guidelines. BP4: No REVEL available, splicing evaluation needed.Functional data on splicing not available.A) variant not on limits.B) variant is exonic and at least 50bp upstream from the canonical donor site, but it does not create AG.C) there is an AG nearby.MES scores: variant cryptic = -1.41, wt cryptic = -2.30, canonical acceptor = 9.58.Ratio variant cryptic/wt cryptic: -1.41/-2.30 = 0.61 --- it is not above 1.1Ratio variant cryptic/canonical acceptor: -1.41/9.58 = 0.15--- it is not above 0.9Variant is not predicted to alter splicing. So BP4 is met. BP7: Variant is synonymous and meets BP4. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA023600/MONDO:0007750/013

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00025 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00029 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

LDLR
NM_000527.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:14O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.45
Variant links:
Genes affected
LDLR (HGNC:6547): (low density lipoprotein receptor) The low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene family consists of cell surface proteins involved in receptor-mediated endocytosis of specific ligands. The encoded protein is normally bound at the cell membrane, where it binds low density lipoprotein/cholesterol and is taken into the cell. Lysosomes release the cholesterol, which is made available for repression of microsomal enzyme 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase, the rate-limiting step in cholesterol synthesis. At the same time, a reciprocal stimulation of cholesterol ester synthesis takes place. Mutations in this gene cause the autosomal dominant disorder, familial hypercholesterolemia. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants.[provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.

PP1
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
BP2
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
BP4
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
BP7
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
LDLRNM_000527.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1875C>T p.Asn625= synonymous_variant 13/18 ENST00000558518.6 NP_000518.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
LDLRENST00000558518.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.1875C>T p.Asn625= synonymous_variant 13/181 NM_000527.5 ENSP00000454071 P3P01130-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000250
AC:
38
AN:
152186
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000482
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000787
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000942
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000338
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000243
AC:
61
AN:
251492
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000280
AC XY:
38
AN XY:
135920
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000520
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000334
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000651
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000287
AC:
419
AN:
1461836
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000292
AC XY:
212
AN XY:
727220
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000402
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000374
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000343
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000281
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000250
AC:
38
AN:
152186
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000215
AC XY:
16
AN XY:
74332
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000482
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000787
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000942
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000338
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000384
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000295
EpiCase
AF:
0.000218
EpiControl
AF:
0.000296

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:14Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hypercholesterolemia, familial, 1 Uncertain:1Benign:5
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationClinGen Familial Hypercholesterolemia Variant Curation Expert PanelApr 28, 2023The NM_000527.5(LDLR):c.1875C>T (p.Asn625=) variant is classified as Likely Benign for Familial Hypercholesterolemia by applying evidence codes PP1, BP2, BP4, and BP7 as defined by the ClinGen Familial Hypercholesterolemia Expert Panel LDLR-specific variant curation guidelines (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2021.09.012). Variant has 3 supporting evidence codes towards Benign, enough to classify as Likely benign, and only 1 supporting evidence codes towards Pathogenic. The Benign criteria overwhelms the Pathogenic criteria, so we are confident in classifying this variant as Likely benign. The supporting evidence is as follows: PP1: Variant segregates with FH phenotype in 2 informative meioses in 1 families from Cardiovascular Research Group, Instituto Nacional de Saude Doutor Ricardo Jorge. So PP1 is met. BP2: 1 individual from Cardiovascular Research Group,Instituto Nacional de Saude Doutor Ricardo Jorge with LDLR c.1598G>A. Phenotype LDL 168mg/dl under statins - Htz phenotype, c.1598G>A - Pathogenic by these guidelines. BP4: No REVEL available, splicing evaluation needed. Functional data on splicing not available. A) variant not on limits. B) variant is exonic and at least 50bp upstream from the canonical donor site, but it does not create AG. C) there is an AG nearby. MES scores: variant cryptic = -1.41, wt cryptic = -2.30, canonical acceptor = 9.58. Ratio variant cryptic/wt cryptic: -1.41/-2.30 = 0.61 --- it is not above 1.1 Ratio variant cryptic/canonical acceptor: -1.41/9.58 = 0.15--- it is not above 0.9 Variant is not predicted to alter splicing. So BP4 is met. BP7: Variant is synonymous and meets BP4. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingRobarts Research Institute, Western UniversityJan 02, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterliterature onlyLDLR-LOVD, British Heart FoundationMar 25, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchCardiovascular Biomarker Research Laboratory, Mayo ClinicAug 31, 2015MAF =<0.3% -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchCardiovascular Research Group, Instituto Nacional de Saude Doutor Ricardo JorgeMar 01, 20160/95 non-FH individuals -
Familial hypercholesterolemia Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthJul 07, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Jan 02, 2020- -
not provided Benign:2Other:1
not provided, no classification providedliterature onlySNPedia-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 04, 2021This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22881376, 18065781, 17347910, 25985138) -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpOct 28, 2019- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
LDLR-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesNov 30, 2023This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 10, 2016This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.72
CADD
Benign
4.5
DANN
Benign
0.81
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.10
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs137853962; hg19: chr19-11230797; API