rs137853962
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 1P and 3B. BP7PP1BP4BP2
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The NM_000527.5(LDLR):c.1875C>T (p.Asn625=) variant is classified as Likely Benign for Familial Hypercholesterolemia by applying evidence codes PP1, BP2, BP4, and BP7 as defined by the ClinGen Familial Hypercholesterolemia Expert Panel LDLR-specific variant curation guidelines (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2021.09.012). Variant has 3 supporting evidence codes towards Benign, enough to classify as Likely benign, and only 1 supporting evidence codes towards Pathogenic. The Benign criteria overwhelms the Pathogenic criteria, so we are confident in classifying this variant as Likely benign.The supporting evidence is as follows: PP1: Variant segregates with FH phenotype in 2 informative meioses in 1 families from Cardiovascular Research Group, Instituto Nacional de Saude Doutor Ricardo Jorge. So PP1 is met. BP2: 1 individual from Cardiovascular Research Group,Instituto Nacional de Saude Doutor Ricardo Jorge with LDLR c.1598G>A. Phenotype LDL 168mg/dl under statins - Htz phenotype, c.1598G>A - Pathogenic by these guidelines. BP4: No REVEL available, splicing evaluation needed.Functional data on splicing not available.A) variant not on limits.B) variant is exonic and at least 50bp upstream from the canonical donor site, but it does not create AG.C) there is an AG nearby.MES scores: variant cryptic = -1.41, wt cryptic = -2.30, canonical acceptor = 9.58.Ratio variant cryptic/wt cryptic: -1.41/-2.30 = 0.61 --- it is not above 1.1Ratio variant cryptic/canonical acceptor: -1.41/9.58 = 0.15--- it is not above 0.9Variant is not predicted to alter splicing. So BP4 is met. BP7: Variant is synonymous and meets BP4. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA023600/MONDO:0007750/013
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000527.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDLR | NM_000527.5 | c.1875C>T | p.Asn625= | synonymous_variant | 13/18 | ENST00000558518.6 | NP_000518.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDLR | ENST00000558518.6 | c.1875C>T | p.Asn625= | synonymous_variant | 13/18 | 1 | NM_000527.5 | ENSP00000454071 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000250 AC: 38AN: 152186Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000243 AC: 61AN: 251492Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000280 AC XY: 38AN XY: 135920
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000287 AC: 419AN: 1461836Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000292 AC XY: 212AN XY: 727220
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000250 AC: 38AN: 152186Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000215 AC XY: 16AN XY: 74332
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hypercholesterolemia, familial, 1 Uncertain:1Benign:5
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen Familial Hypercholesterolemia Variant Curation Expert Panel | Apr 28, 2023 | The NM_000527.5(LDLR):c.1875C>T (p.Asn625=) variant is classified as Likely Benign for Familial Hypercholesterolemia by applying evidence codes PP1, BP2, BP4, and BP7 as defined by the ClinGen Familial Hypercholesterolemia Expert Panel LDLR-specific variant curation guidelines (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2021.09.012). Variant has 3 supporting evidence codes towards Benign, enough to classify as Likely benign, and only 1 supporting evidence codes towards Pathogenic. The Benign criteria overwhelms the Pathogenic criteria, so we are confident in classifying this variant as Likely benign. The supporting evidence is as follows: PP1: Variant segregates with FH phenotype in 2 informative meioses in 1 families from Cardiovascular Research Group, Instituto Nacional de Saude Doutor Ricardo Jorge. So PP1 is met. BP2: 1 individual from Cardiovascular Research Group,Instituto Nacional de Saude Doutor Ricardo Jorge with LDLR c.1598G>A. Phenotype LDL 168mg/dl under statins - Htz phenotype, c.1598G>A - Pathogenic by these guidelines. BP4: No REVEL available, splicing evaluation needed. Functional data on splicing not available. A) variant not on limits. B) variant is exonic and at least 50bp upstream from the canonical donor site, but it does not create AG. C) there is an AG nearby. MES scores: variant cryptic = -1.41, wt cryptic = -2.30, canonical acceptor = 9.58. Ratio variant cryptic/wt cryptic: -1.41/-2.30 = 0.61 --- it is not above 1.1 Ratio variant cryptic/canonical acceptor: -1.41/9.58 = 0.15--- it is not above 0.9 Variant is not predicted to alter splicing. So BP4 is met. BP7: Variant is synonymous and meets BP4. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Robarts Research Institute, Western University | Jan 02, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | literature only | LDLR-LOVD, British Heart Foundation | Mar 25, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Cardiovascular Biomarker Research Laboratory, Mayo Clinic | Aug 31, 2015 | MAF =<0.3% - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Cardiovascular Research Group, Instituto Nacional de Saude Doutor Ricardo Jorge | Mar 01, 2016 | 0/95 non-FH individuals - |
Familial hypercholesterolemia Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jul 07, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Jan 02, 2020 | - - |
not provided Benign:2Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | SNPedia | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 04, 2021 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22881376, 18065781, 17347910, 25985138) - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Oct 28, 2019 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
LDLR-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Nov 30, 2023 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 10, 2016 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at