rs137854154

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.1378G>A(p.Ala460Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000723 in 1,551,020 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00075 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00072 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

TSC2
NM_000548.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:22O:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.29

Variant links:

Genes affected

TSC2 (HGNC:12363): (TSC complex subunit 2) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein tuberin. Tuberin interacts with hamartin to form the TSC protein complex which functions in the control of cell growth. This TSC protein complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

TSC2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009741932).

BP6

Variant 16-2062988-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2062988-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 49660.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-2062988-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr16-2062988-G-A is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000748 (114/152350) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0005 (34/68026). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000368. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 56 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 114 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TSC2	NM_000548.5 link	c.1378G>A	p.Ala460Thr	missense_variant	Exon 14 of 42	ENST00000219476.9	NP_000539.2	P49815-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TSC2	ENST00000219476.9 link	c.1378G>A	p.Ala460Thr	missense_variant	Exon 14 of 42	5	NM_000548.5	ENSP00000219476.3		P49815-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000749

AC:

114

AN:

152232

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000327

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.0161

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000192

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.0411

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000500

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00144

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00125

AC:

194

AN:

155816

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00134

AC XY:

110

AN XY:

82070

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000229

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000243

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0131

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000885

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000878

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000733

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00612

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000721

AC:

1008

AN:

1398670

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000768

AC XY:

530

AN XY:

689880

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000317

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000420

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0149

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000840

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000114

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000417

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00166

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000748

AC:

114

AN:

152350

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000752

AC XY:

AN XY:

74492

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000240

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000327

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.0161

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000500

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00142

Alfa

AF:

0.00141

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000869

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000257

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00108

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000872

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:22Other:2

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:7Other:1

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 19, 2013

ITMI

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: reference population

- -

Jun 28, 2021

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: TSC2 c.1378G>A (p.Ala460Thr) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Tuberin, N-terminal domain of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0012 in 155816 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 18.11 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in TSC2 causing Tuberous Sclerosis Complex phenotype (6.9e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.1378G>A in individuals affected with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Eight clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 21, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 25, 2016

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ExAC: 0.5% (46/8536) European chromosomes; ClinVar: 2 labs classify as LB. 3/5 pubs describe as nonpathogenic. -

Oct 07, 2021

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Tuberous sclerosis 2

Benign:6

Sep 20, 2022

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 07, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019

Mendelics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 05, 2020

Biochemical Molecular Genetic Laboratory, King Abdulaziz Medical City

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:4

Nov 08, 2018

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25281918, 25637381, 21309039, 24728327, 19258292, 27884173) -

Nov 23, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Jan 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

TSC2: BS1 -

Tuberous sclerosis syndrome

Benign:3Other:1

Tuberous sclerosis database (TSC2)

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: curation

- -

Feb 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Sep 23, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 01, 2014

CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: research

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

May 10, 2020

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Aug 20, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.089

BayesDel_addAF

Uncertain

0.068

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.24

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.33

T;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;T;.;T

Eigen

Uncertain

0.40

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.44

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.94

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.87

D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.16

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0097

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

-0.18

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.6

L;.;.;.;L;L;.;.;.;L;.;L;.;.;.

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.49

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.43

N;.;.;N;.;N;.;.;N;N;.;.;.;.;N

REVEL

Uncertain

0.56

Sift

Benign

0.41

T;.;.;T;.;T;.;.;T;T;.;.;.;.;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.59

T;.;.;T;.;T;.;.;T;T;.;.;.;.;T

Polyphen

1.0

D;.;.;.;D;D;.;.;D;P;.;.;.;.;.

Vest4

0.65

MVP

0.81

ClinPred

0.060

GERP RS

5.2

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.079

gMVP

0.17

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.030

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over