rs137854239

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 3P and 9B. PM1PM4_SupportingBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000548.5(TSC2):​c.4527_4529delCTT​(p.Phe1510del) variant causes a disruptive inframe deletion change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00521 in 1,613,366 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 44 homozygotes. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. F1509F) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0036 ( 3 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0054 ( 41 hom. )

Consequence

TSC2
NM_000548.5 disruptive_inframe_deletion

Scores

Not classified

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:25O:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.16

Publications

9 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TSC2 (HGNC:12363): (TSC complex subunit 2) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein tuberin. Tuberin interacts with hamartin to form the TSC protein complex which functions in the control of cell growth. This TSC protein complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
TSC2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • tuberous sclerosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • tuberous sclerosis 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
  • lymphangioleiomyomatosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • tuberous sclerosis complex
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 4 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 10 benign, 37 uncertain in NM_000548.5
PM4
Nonframeshift variant in NON repetitive region in NM_000548.5. Strenght limited to Supporting due to length of the change: 1aa.
BP6
Variant 16-2084980-CCTT-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2084980-CCTT-C is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 49302.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00362 (552/152350) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00911 (44/4828). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00698. There are 3 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 281 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 552 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TSC2NM_000548.5 linkc.4527_4529delCTT p.Phe1510del disruptive_inframe_deletion Exon 35 of 42 ENST00000219476.9 NP_000539.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TSC2ENST00000219476.9 linkc.4527_4529delCTT p.Phe1510del disruptive_inframe_deletion Exon 35 of 42 5 NM_000548.5 ENSP00000219476.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00363
AC:
552
AN:
152232
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000651
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00209
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0302
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000385
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00911
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00612
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00394
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00539
AC:
1350
AN:
250376
AF XY:
0.00594
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000681
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00119
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0336
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00476
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00475
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00491
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00538
AC:
7858
AN:
1461016
Hom.:
41
AF XY:
0.00562
AC XY:
4082
AN XY:
726798
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000597
AC:
20
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00152
AC:
68
AN:
44720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0338
AC:
883
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000756
AC:
3
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00991
AC:
855
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00485
AC:
255
AN:
52622
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00693
AC:
40
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00475
AC:
5284
AN:
1111960
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00745
AC:
450
AN:
60376
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.468
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
540
1080
1620
2160
2700
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
216
432
648
864
1080
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00362
AC:
552
AN:
152350
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00377
AC XY:
281
AN XY:
74500
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000649
AC:
27
AN:
41588
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00209
AC:
32
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0302
AC:
105
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000386
AC:
2
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00911
AC:
44
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00612
AC:
65
AN:
10628
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0136
AC:
4
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00394
AC:
268
AN:
68022
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00236
AC:
5
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.493
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
29
58
87
116
145
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00787
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00334
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00346
AC:
12
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00447
EpiControl
AF:
0.00528

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:25Other:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9Other:1
Feb 14, 2018
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 28, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ExAC: 0.9% (155/16504) South Asian chromosomes. ClinVar: 3 labs classify as benign/likely benign -

Jun 17, 2021
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 30, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The variant is found in EPILEPSY,INFANT-EPI panel(s). -

Feb 07, 2022
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 17, 2017
Institute for Genomic Medicine (IGM) Clinical Laboratory, Nationwide Children's Hospital
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BS1, BP6; This alteration has an allele frequency that is greater than expected for the associated disease, and was reported as a benign/likely benign alteration by a reputable source (ClinVar or other correspondence from a clinical testing laboratory). -

Dec 28, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:reference population

- -

Sep 24, 2022
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Tuberous sclerosis 2 Uncertain:1Benign:6
May 25, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2016
Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 07, 2023
Molecular Genetics, Royal Melbourne Hospital
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 04, 2025
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. Homozygosity has been confirmed in one or more individuals. As homozygosity for pathogenic variants in this gene is generally assumed to result in embryonic lethality, this variant is unlikely to be pathogenic. -

not provided Benign:5
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 13, 2012
Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:research

- -

Jul 28, 2017
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 27, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

TSC2: PM4:Supporting, BS2 -

Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Benign:2Other:2
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 06, 2011
Tuberous sclerosis database (TSC2)
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:curation

- -

Sep 20, 2022
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 06, 2011
Tuberous sclerosis database (TSC2)
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:curation

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Jul 20, 2017
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Feb 24, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Lung lymphangioleiomyomatosis Benign:1
Aug 04, 2021
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
PhyloP100
6.2
Mutation Taster
=25/75
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs137854239; hg19: chr16-2134981; COSMIC: COSV51914189; COSMIC: COSV51914189; API