rs137854585
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 18 ACMG points: 18P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP3_StrongPP5_Very_Strong
The NM_000397.4(CYBB):c.1244C>A(p.Pro415His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P415R) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000397.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- granulomatous disease, chronic, X-linkedInheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, G2P
- chronic granulomatous diseaseInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- X-linked Mendelian susceptibility to mycobacterial diseases due to CYBB deficiencyInheritance: XL, Unknown Classification: SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 18 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000397.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYBB | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1244C>A | p.Pro415His | missense | Exon 10 of 13 | ENSP00000367851.4 | P04839 | ||
| ENSG00000250349 | TSL:5 | c.171+379098C>A | intron | N/A | ENSP00000417050.1 | B4E171 | |||
| CYBB | c.1244C>A | p.Pro415His | missense | Exon 10 of 14 | ENSP00000638617.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 24
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 24
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at