rs137854615
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 12 ACMG points: 12P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP2PP3_StrongPP5
The NM_001099404.2(SCN5A):c.5383T>C(p.Tyr1795His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Y1795C) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001099404.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCN5A | NM_001099404.2 | c.5383T>C | p.Tyr1795His | missense_variant | 28/28 | ENST00000413689.6 | |
SCN5A | NM_000335.5 | c.5380T>C | p.Tyr1794His | missense_variant | 28/28 | ENST00000423572.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCN5A | ENST00000413689.6 | c.5383T>C | p.Tyr1795His | missense_variant | 28/28 | 5 | NM_001099404.2 | P4 | |
SCN5A | ENST00000423572.7 | c.5380T>C | p.Tyr1794His | missense_variant | 28/28 | 1 | NM_000335.5 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 35
GnomAD4 genome ? Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Brugada syndrome 1 Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Aug 17, 2001 | - - |
Brugada syndrome Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust | - | This variant has been reported as associated with Brugada syndrome in the following publications (PMID:11076825;PMID:11410597;PMID:11901046). This is a literature report, and does not necessarily reflect the clinical interpretation of the Imperial College / Royal Brompton Cardiovascular Genetics laboratory. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at