Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2
The ENST00000357033.9(DMD):c.9165G>A(p.Thr3055=) variant causes a splice region, synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000804 in 1,206,601 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 26 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
DMD (HGNC:2928): (dystrophin) This gene spans a genomic range of greater than 2 Mb and encodes a large protein containing an N-terminal actin-binding domain and multiple spectrin repeats. The encoded protein forms a component of the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex (DGC), which bridges the inner cytoskeleton and the extracellular matrix. Deletions, duplications, and point mutations at this gene locus may cause Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD), or cardiomyopathy. Alternative promoter usage and alternative splicing result in numerous distinct transcript variants and protein isoforms for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2016]
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).
BP6
Variant X-31323657-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-31323657-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 286909.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=2}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.35 with no splicing effect.
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
GeneDx
Dec 08, 2017
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Sep 18, 2018
- -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Ambry Genetics
Nov 29, 2017
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -