rs137917233
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_182760.4(SUMF1):āc.664G>Cā(p.Gly222Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00228 in 1,614,078 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.0017 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š: 0.0023 ( 3 hom. )
Consequence
SUMF1
NM_182760.4 missense
NM_182760.4 missense
Scores
5
10
4
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 2.16
Genes affected
SUMF1 (HGNC:20376): (sulfatase modifying factor 1) This gene encodes an enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of sulfate esters by oxidizing a cysteine residue in the substrate sulfatase to an active site 3-oxoalanine residue, which is also known as C-alpha-formylglycine. Mutations in this gene cause multiple sulfatase deficiency, a lysosomal storage disorder. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.
PM1
In a disulfide_bond (size 147) in uniprot entity SUMF1_HUMAN there are 4 pathogenic changes around while only 0 benign (100%) in NM_182760.4
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.028752208).
BP6
Variant 3-4418071-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-4418071-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 345316.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=4}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00173 (264/152302) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00601 (92/15302). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00502. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 131 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUMF1 | NM_182760.4 | c.664G>C | p.Gly222Arg | missense_variant | 5/9 | ENST00000272902.10 | NP_877437.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUMF1 | ENST00000272902.10 | c.664G>C | p.Gly222Arg | missense_variant | 5/9 | 1 | NM_182760.4 | ENSP00000272902.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00173 AC: 264AN: 152184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
264
AN:
152184
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00163 AC: 409AN: 251404Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00155 AC XY: 210AN XY: 135870
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
409
AN:
251404
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
210
AN XY:
135870
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00234 AC: 3421AN: 1461776Hom.: 3 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00223 AC XY: 1624AN XY: 727188
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
3421
AN:
1461776
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
1624
AN XY:
727188
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00173 AC: 264AN: 152302Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00176 AC XY: 131AN XY: 74484
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
264
AN:
152302
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
131
AN XY:
74484
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
8
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
7
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
4
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
23
ExAC
AF:
AC:
193
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Multiple sulfatase deficiency Uncertain:3Benign:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Genetics Lab, CHRU Brest | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Sep 05, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Apr 23, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 31, 2018 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:4Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Apr 20, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 16, 2018 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29375859) - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
SUMF1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Apr 13, 2022 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
D;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
D;D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
M;.;M
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
D;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Uncertain
D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D;D
Polyphen
D;.;.
Vest4
MutPred
Loss of catalytic residue at A221 (P = 0.0391);.;Loss of catalytic residue at A221 (P = 0.0391);
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at