rs137924231
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_017802.4(DNAAF5):c.1976C>T(p.Ala659Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000112 in 1,613,776 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A659A) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_017802.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- primary ciliary dyskinesia 18Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- primary ciliary dyskinesiaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNAAF5 | NM_017802.4 | c.1976C>T | p.Ala659Val | missense_variant | Exon 10 of 13 | ENST00000297440.11 | NP_060272.3 | |
| DNAAF5 | XM_024446813.2 | c.1976C>T | p.Ala659Val | missense_variant | Exon 10 of 12 | XP_024302581.1 | ||
| DNAAF5 | NR_075098.2 | n.1936C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 10 of 13 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNAAF5 | ENST00000297440.11 | c.1976C>T | p.Ala659Val | missense_variant | Exon 10 of 13 | 1 | NM_017802.4 | ENSP00000297440.6 | ||
| DNAAF5 | ENST00000403952.3 | c.251C>T | p.Ala84Val | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 6 | 1 | ENSP00000384884.3 | |||
| DNAAF5 | ENST00000440747.5 | c.1379C>T | p.Ala460Val | missense_variant | Exon 10 of 13 | 2 | ENSP00000403165.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152208Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000200 AC: 5AN: 250570 AF XY: 0.00000738 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000616 AC: 9AN: 1461568Hom.: 0 Cov.: 38 AF XY: 0.00000688 AC XY: 5AN XY: 727100 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152208Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74352 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Uncertain:1Benign:1
This sequence change replaces alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, with valine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 659 of the DNAAF5 protein (p.Ala659Val). This variant is present in population databases (rs137924231, gnomAD 0.02%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with DNAAF5-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 454856). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0". The valine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at