Menu
GeneBe

rs137982921

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_015272.5(RPGRIP1L):c.1156A>G(p.Lys386Glu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00118 in 1,613,608 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00098 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

RPGRIP1L
NM_015272.5 missense

Scores

10
8

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:9B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.52
Variant links:
Genes affected
RPGRIP1L (HGNC:29168): (RPGRIP1 like) The protein encoded by this gene can localize to the basal body-centrosome complex or to primary cilia and centrosomes in ciliated cells. The encoded protein has been found to interact with nephrocystin-4. Defects in this gene are a cause of Joubert syndrome type 7 (JBTS7) and Meckel syndrome type 5 (MKS5). [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.031334817).
BP6
Variant 16-53664957-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-53664957-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 193717.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=7, Likely_benign=3}. Variant chr16-53664957-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000978 (149/152334) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00314 (48/15292). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00243. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 68 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
RPGRIP1LNM_015272.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1156A>G p.Lys386Glu missense_variant 10/27 ENST00000647211.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
RPGRIP1LENST00000647211.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1156A>G p.Lys386Glu missense_variant 10/27 NM_015272.5 Q68CZ1-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000979
AC:
149
AN:
152216
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00314
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000941
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00129
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000846
AC:
212
AN:
250614
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000908
AC XY:
123
AN XY:
135452
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000199
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000936
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00130
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00164
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00120
AC:
1748
AN:
1461274
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00120
AC XY:
871
AN XY:
726964
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000896
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00150
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000765
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000226
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00143
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00119
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000978
AC:
149
AN:
152334
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000913
AC XY:
68
AN XY:
74488
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00314
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000941
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00129
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00189
Alfa
AF:
0.00104
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00122
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00324
AC:
12
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00156
AC:
6
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00128
AC:
11
ExAC
AF:
0.000774
AC:
94
EpiCase
AF:
0.00153
EpiControl
AF:
0.00166

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:9Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:4
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The RPGRIP1L p.Lys386Glu variant was identified in 1 of 384 proband chromosomes (Frequency: 0.0026) from individuals with nephronophthisis-associated ciliopathy (Halbritter_2012_PMID:23188109). The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs137982921) and ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Invitae, EGL Genetic Diagnostics, Fulgent Genetics, GeneDx, and Illumina). The variant was identified in control databases in 228 of 282020 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0008085 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The variant was observed in the following populations: Latino in 54 of 35376 chromosomes (freq: 0.001526), Other in 10 of 7194 chromosomes (freq: 0.00139), European (non-Finnish) in 158 of 128734 chromosomes (freq: 0.001227), Ashkenazi Jewish in 2 of 10354 chromosomes (freq: 0.000193), European (Finnish) in 2 of 24848 chromosomes (freq: 0.00008) and African in 2 of 24964 chromosomes (freq: 0.00008), but was not observed in the East Asian or South Asian populations. The p.Lys386 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenApr 01, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Apr 30, 2015- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 29, 2018The K386E variant in the RPGRIP1L gene has not been reported previously as a pathogenic variant, nor as a benign variant, to our knowledge. Although not present in the homozygous state, the K386E variant is observed in 82/66610 (0.23%) alleles from individuals of non-Finnish European background, in the ExAC dataset (Lek et al., 2016). The K386E variant is a non-conservative amino acid substitution, which is likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in polarity, charge, size and/or other properties. This substitution occurs at a position where amino acids with similar properties to Lysine are tolerated across species. In silico analysis is inconsistent in its predictions as to whether or not the variant is damaging to the protein structure/function. We interpret K386E as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Joubert syndrome 7 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Meckel syndrome, type 5 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Meckel syndrome, type 5;C1969053:Joubert syndrome 7;C5435651:COACH syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsOct 31, 2018- -
Nephronophthisis 8 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Familial aplasia of the vermis Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Apr 24, 2020- -
RPGRIP1L-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesFeb 04, 2022This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsAug 17, 2022This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.16
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.20
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.070
Cadd
Benign
22
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
Eigen
Benign
0.15
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.28
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.93
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.89
D;.;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.080
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.031
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.13
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.3
M;M;.;M;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.50
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.0
N;.;.;N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.41
Sift
Uncertain
0.0060
D;.;.;D;D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.20
T;.;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.53
P;B;.;B;.;.
Vest4
0.60
MVP
0.70
MPC
0.13
ClinPred
0.042
T
GERP RS
5.4
Varity_R
0.46
gMVP
0.33

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs137982921; hg19: chr16-53698869; API