Menu
GeneBe

rs137993172

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM2BP4_ModerateBS1_Supporting

The NM_006096.4(NDRG1):c.686A>G(p.Asn229Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000441 in 1,613,834 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. N229N) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00024 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00046 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

NDRG1
NM_006096.4 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.53
Variant links:
Genes affected
NDRG1 (HGNC:7679): (N-myc downstream regulated 1) This gene is a member of the N-myc downregulated gene family which belongs to the alpha/beta hydrolase superfamily. The protein encoded by this gene is a cytoplasmic protein involved in stress responses, hormone responses, cell growth, and differentiation. The encoded protein is necessary for p53-mediated caspase activation and apoptosis. Mutations in this gene are a cause of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4D, and expression of this gene may be a prognostic indicator for several types of cancer. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been observed for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.102074444).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000237 (36/152156) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000441 (30/68034). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000317. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 15 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
NDRG1NM_006096.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.686A>G p.Asn229Ser missense_variant 10/16 ENST00000323851.13

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
NDRG1ENST00000323851.13 linkuse as main transcriptc.686A>G p.Asn229Ser missense_variant 10/161 NM_006096.4 P1Q92597-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000237
AC:
36
AN:
152156
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000965
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000957
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000187
AC:
47
AN:
251490
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000213
AC XY:
29
AN XY:
135920
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000578
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000360
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000462
AC:
676
AN:
1461678
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000446
AC XY:
324
AN XY:
727152
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000598
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000447
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000579
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000431
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000237
AC:
36
AN:
152156
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000202
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
74326
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000965
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000441
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000957
Alfa
AF:
0.000329
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000249
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000809
AC:
3
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000349
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
0.000181
AC:
22
EpiCase
AF:
0.000273
EpiControl
AF:
0.000296

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicApr 30, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 09, 2021Reported previously as a variant of uncertain significance in a patient with suspected Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease; however, further clinical and segregation information was not provided (Volodarsky et al., 2021); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32376792) -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4D Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsApr 05, 2022- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4 Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeOct 31, 2022This sequence change replaces asparagine, which is neutral and polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 229 of the NDRG1 protein (p.Asn229Ser). This variant is present in population databases (rs137993172, gnomAD 0.03%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (PMID: 32376792). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 543370). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt NDRG1 protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre-- -
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 29, 2022The c.686A>G (p.N229S) alteration is located in exon 10 (coding exon 9) of the NDRG1 gene. This alteration results from a A to G substitution at nucleotide position 686, causing the asparagine (N) at amino acid position 229 to be replaced by a serine (S). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.058
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.58
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.76
Cadd
Benign
20
Dann
Benign
0.83
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.19
T;.;T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.48
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.44
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.71
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.0062
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.10
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.7
L;.;L;.
MutationTaster
Benign
0.98
D;D;N;N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.40
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.9
N;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.18
Sift
Benign
0.14
T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.20
T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;.;B;.
Vest4
0.13
MVP
0.46
MPC
0.24
ClinPred
0.016
T
GERP RS
2.8
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.074
gMVP
0.24

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs137993172; hg19: chr8-134262695; COSMIC: COSV60485040; COSMIC: COSV60485040; API