rs138041990
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 2P and 11B. PM1BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2
The NM_001136472.2(LITAF):c.44C>T(p.Ser15Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000282 in 1,614,086 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001136472.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LITAF | NM_001136472.2 | c.44C>T | p.Ser15Leu | missense_variant | 2/4 | ENST00000622633.5 | NP_001129944.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LITAF | ENST00000622633.5 | c.44C>T | p.Ser15Leu | missense_variant | 2/4 | 1 | NM_001136472.2 | ENSP00000483114 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000289 AC: 44AN: 152198Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000231 AC: 58AN: 251404Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000265 AC XY: 36AN XY: 135892
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000281 AC: 411AN: 1461888Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000290 AC XY: 211AN XY: 727242
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000289 AC: 44AN: 152198Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000256 AC XY: 19AN XY: 74348
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Apr 01, 2024 | LITAF: BS2 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 21, 2021 | See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1C Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 28, 2024 | - - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre | - | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 18, 2020 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at