rs138065384
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 4P and 3B. PM1PM5BP4_ModerateBS2_Supporting
The NM_000371.4(TTR):āc.190T>Cā(p.Phe64Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000273 in 1,613,894 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. F64S) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000371.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTR | NM_000371.4 | c.190T>C | p.Phe64Leu | missense_variant | 2/4 | ENST00000237014.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTR | ENST00000237014.8 | c.190T>C | p.Phe64Leu | missense_variant | 2/4 | 1 | NM_000371.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000158 AC: 24AN: 152160Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000437 AC: 11AN: 251466Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000441 AC XY: 6AN XY: 135908
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000137 AC: 20AN: 1461616Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000138 AC XY: 10AN XY: 727150
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000158 AC: 24AN: 152278Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000148 AC XY: 11AN XY: 74456
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 15, 2016 | A variant of uncertain significance was identified in the TTR gene. The F64L variant has previously been reported in association with cardiac amyloidosis (Connors et al., 2009; Reddi et al., 2014; Rowczenio et al., 2014). F64L (reported as F44L due to alternate nomenclature) was initially reported in an African American patient with amyloidosis who also harbored a second missense variant on the opposite TTR allele (in trans) (Connors et al., 2009). The F64L (reported as F44L) variant has also been reported in a Caucasian individual with cardiac involvement in the Online Registry for Mutations in Hereditary Amyloidosis (Rowczenio et al., 2014). Additionally, this variant has also been observed in other unrelated individuals referred for cardiomyopathy genetic testing at GeneDx, and has been classified in ClinVar as a variant of uncertain significance by another clinical laboratory (ClinVar SCV000204704.5; Landrum et al., 2016). The F64L variant was not observed at a significant frequency in approximately 6,500 individuals of European and African American ancestry in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, indicating it is not a common benign variant in these populations. Other missense variants in nearby residues (W61L, E62G, E62D, A65S, A65T, A65D) and at the same residue (F64Y, F64S) have been reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database in association with amyloidosis, amylodotic polyneuropathy, and cardiomyopathy (Stenson et al., 2014); however, the pathogenicity of these variants has not been definitively determined. In addition, the F64L variant is a conservative amino acid substitution, which is not likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues share similar properties. Furthermore, this substitution occurs at a position where amino acids with similar properties to Phenylalanine are tolerated across species, and in silico algorithms are inconsistent in predicting an effect of this variant on protein structure/function. Therefore, based on the currently available information, it is unclear whether this variant is pathogenic or benign. - |
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jun 14, 2023 | The frequency of this variant is statistically more frequent in affected individuals than in the general population and/or healthy controls (Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD), Cambridge, MA (URL: http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)). This variant has been identified in multiple unrelated individuals with hereditary transthyretin-related amyloidosis, including individuals with cardiac transthyretin amyloidosis. In Italy, it has been suggested to be one of the most common variants associated with FAP (familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy) (PMID: 36289657). Multiple affected individuals have been reported with missense changes at this codon, suggesting this variant also causes disease. This variant is also referred to as F44L and F84L in published literature. - |
Amyloidosis, hereditary systemic 1 Pathogenic:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 17, 2023 | - - |
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute of Immunology and Genetics Kaiserslautern | Jul 03, 2023 | ACMG Citeria: PM2, PM5, PP5, PS3_M; Variant found in a heterozygous state - |
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Apr 06, 2021 | Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Pathogenic. The p.Phe64Leu variant in TTR has been reported in at least 17 individuals with amyloidosis, including one homozygote and one compound heterozygote for another pathogenic TTR missesne variant which suggests that this variant may not be the primary cause of disease in this individual.(Ferlini 1996 PMID: 8721565, Comenzo 2006 PMID: 16439680, Connors 2009 PMID: 19781421, Cappellari 2011 PMID: 21692911, Klein 2011 PMID: 20937937, Rapezzi 2011 PMID: 21679902, Luigetti 2012 PMID: 22592564). It has also been reported in two individuals with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (Walsh 2017 PMID: 27532257 Hoss 2020 PMID: 32150461, LMM data). It has been identified in 0.06% (14/24960) of African American chromosomes by gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant has also been reported in ClinVar (Variation ID 178280). Computational prediction tools and conservation analyses do not provide strong support for or against an impact to the protein. In vitro functional studies provide some evidence that this variant impacts protein function (Altland 2007 PMID: 17503405); however, these types of assays may not accurately represent biological function. Additional variants involving this codon (p.Phe64Ser and p.Phe64Tyr) have been identified in individuals with amyloidosis. In summary, while there is some suspicion for a pathogenic role, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain: ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: PS4, PS3_Supporting. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 20, 2024 | Variant summary: TTR c.190T>C (p.Phe64Leu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4.4e-05 in 251466 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00062 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 12 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in TTR causing Isolated Cardiac Amyloidosis phenotype (5e-05). c.190T>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Isolated Cardiac Amyloidosis or cardiomyopathy, as well as unaffected carriers (e.g. Connors_2009, Walsh_2017, Musumeci_2020). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Isolated Cardiac Amyloidosis. Co-occurrence with another pathogenic variant has been reported (TTR c.424G>A, p.Val142Ile, Connors_2009), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, however, does not allow convincing conclusions about the variant effect (Altland_2007). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 19781421, 17503405, 27532257, 31864976). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 178280). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre | - | - - |
Cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Jul 08, 2020 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 13, 2022 | The p.F64L variant (also known as c.190T>C), located in coding exon 2 of the TTR gene, results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 190. The phenylalanine at codon 64 is replaced by leucine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This variant (also described as p.F44L) has been reported in an individual with amyloidosis, who also had an additional TTR variant detected (Connors LH et al. Am. Heart J., 2009 Oct;158:607-14). This variant was also reported in one individual from a hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) cohort; however, clinical details were limited (Walsh R et al. Genet. Med., 2017 02;19:192-203). This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at