rs138158369

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP6BS1BS2

The NM_002473.6(MYH9):​c.5026A>G​(p.Lys1676Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000546 in 1,613,138 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00043 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00056 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MYH9
NM_002473.6 missense

Scores

3
14
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.63

Publications

8 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYH9 (HGNC:7579): (myosin heavy chain 9) This gene encodes a conventional non-muscle myosin; this protein should not be confused with the unconventional myosin-9a or 9b (MYO9A or MYO9B). The encoded protein is a myosin IIA heavy chain that contains an IQ domain and a myosin head-like domain which is involved in several important functions, including cytokinesis, cell motility and maintenance of cell shape. Defects in this gene have been associated with non-syndromic sensorineural deafness autosomal dominant type 17, Epstein syndrome, Alport syndrome with macrothrombocytopenia, Sebastian syndrome, Fechtner syndrome and macrothrombocytopenia with progressive sensorineural deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]
MIR6819 (HGNC:50155): (microRNA 6819) microRNAs (miRNAs) are short (20-24 nt) non-coding RNAs that are involved in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression in multicellular organisms by affecting both the stability and translation of mRNAs. miRNAs are transcribed by RNA polymerase II as part of capped and polyadenylated primary transcripts (pri-miRNAs) that can be either protein-coding or non-coding. The primary transcript is cleaved by the Drosha ribonuclease III enzyme to produce an approximately 70-nt stem-loop precursor miRNA (pre-miRNA), which is further cleaved by the cytoplasmic Dicer ribonuclease to generate the mature miRNA and antisense miRNA star (miRNA*) products. The mature miRNA is incorporated into a RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), which recognizes target mRNAs through imperfect base pairing with the miRNA and most commonly results in translational inhibition or destabilization of the target mRNA. The RefSeq represents the predicted microRNA stem-loop. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP6
Variant 22-36286753-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-36286753-T-C is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 164421.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000434 (66/152220) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.000735 (50/68042). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000572. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 26 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 66 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYH9NM_002473.6 linkc.5026A>G p.Lys1676Glu missense_variant Exon 35 of 41 ENST00000216181.11 NP_002464.1 P35579-1A0A024R1N1
MIR6819NR_106877.1 linkn.*94A>G downstream_gene_variant
MIR6819unassigned_transcript_3662 n.*94A>G downstream_gene_variant
MIR6819unassigned_transcript_3663 n.*128A>G downstream_gene_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYH9ENST00000216181.11 linkc.5026A>G p.Lys1676Glu missense_variant Exon 35 of 41 1 NM_002473.6 ENSP00000216181.6 P35579-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000434
AC:
66
AN:
152220
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000735
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000331
AC:
83
AN:
250738
AF XY:
0.000339
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000578
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00119
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000572
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000557
AC:
814
AN:
1460918
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000556
AC XY:
404
AN XY:
726782
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000119
AC:
4
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000447
AC:
2
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00184
AC:
48
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
52462
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000347
AC:
2
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000655
AC:
728
AN:
1112002
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000480
AC:
29
AN:
60390
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.476
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
46
92
137
183
229
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
26
52
78
104
130
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000434
AC:
66
AN:
152220
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000350
AC XY:
26
AN XY:
74364
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
8
AN:
41452
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000654
AC:
1
AN:
15288
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00173
AC:
6
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5190
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10622
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000735
AC:
50
AN:
68042
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000478
AC:
1
AN:
2094
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.514
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000624
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000412
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000539
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000259
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000681
AC:
3
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000930
AC:
8
ExAC
AF:
0.000272
AC:
33
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000709
EpiControl
AF:
0.000474

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Jul 12, 2022
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Jan 16, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

MYH9: PP2, BS2 -

not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
May 09, 2013
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The Lys1676Glu variant in MYH9 has not been reported in individuals affected wit h hearing loss, but has been identified in 0.1% (8/8600) of European American ch romosomes in a broad population by the NHLBI Exome sequencing project (http://ev s.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs138158369). Although this variant has been see n in the general population, a pathogenic role cannot be ruled out due to variab le expressivity and onset of hearing loss associated with MYH9 variants (Pecci 2 008). Computational analyses (biochemical amino acid properties, conservation, A lignGVGD, PolyPhen2, and SIFT) do not provide strong support for or against an i mpact to the protein. In summary, additional data is needed to determine the cli nical significance of this variant. -

Nov 19, 2024
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: MYH9 c.5026A>G (p.Lys1676Glu) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the myosin tail domain (IPR002928) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00055 in 1613138 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote, suggesting the variant may be benign. c.5026A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with acute retinal necrosis without evidence of causality (e.g. Heinz_2023). This report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Macrothrombocytopenia And Granulocyte Inclusions With Or Without Nephritis Or Sensorineural Hearing Loss. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publication has been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 38025266). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 164421). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

MYH9-related disorder Benign:2
Mar 21, 2022
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Hearing impairment Benign:1
Apr 12, 2021
Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Cochlear Implant Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

PP3_Supporting, BS1_Strong, BS2_Strong -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.87
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.14
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.080
CADD
Pathogenic
26
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.65
D
Eigen
Uncertain
0.50
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.55
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.93
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.99
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.17
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
0.60
D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.090
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.1
M
PhyloP100
7.6
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.73
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.4
D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.64
Sift
Uncertain
0.0020
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.043
D
Polyphen
0.58
P
Vest4
0.81
MVP
0.80
MPC
1.2
ClinPred
0.55
D
GERP RS
5.4
Varity_R
0.78
gMVP
0.37
Mutation Taster
=53/47
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs138158369; hg19: chr22-36682799; COSMIC: COSV53393024; API