rs138167675
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_016203.4(PRKAG2):c.1704G>A(p.Thr568Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000279 in 1,614,148 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0014 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00016 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
PRKAG2
NM_016203.4 synonymous
NM_016203.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -3.02
Genes affected
PRKAG2 (HGNC:9386): (protein kinase AMP-activated non-catalytic subunit gamma 2) AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a heterotrimeric protein composed of a catalytic alpha subunit, a noncatalytic beta subunit, and a noncatalytic regulatory gamma subunit. Various forms of each of these subunits exist, encoded by different genes. AMPK is an important energy-sensing enzyme that monitors cellular energy status and functions by inactivating key enzymes involved in regulating de novo biosynthesis of fatty acid and cholesterol. This gene is a member of the AMPK gamma subunit family. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and glycogen storage disease of the heart. Alternate transcriptional splice variants, encoding different isoforms, have been characterized. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2015]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 7-151557207-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-151557207-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 45706.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr7-151557207-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr7-151557207-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.02 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00139 (212/152274) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00501 (208/41550). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00445. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 90 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 212 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRKAG2 | NM_016203.4 | c.1704G>A | p.Thr568Thr | synonymous_variant | 16/16 | ENST00000287878.9 | NP_057287.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRKAG2 | ENST00000287878.9 | c.1704G>A | p.Thr568Thr | synonymous_variant | 16/16 | 1 | NM_016203.4 | ENSP00000287878.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00138 AC: 210AN: 152156Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
210
AN:
152156
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000348 AC: 87AN: 249704Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000215 AC XY: 29AN XY: 135146
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
87
AN:
249704
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
29
AN XY:
135146
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000163 AC: 238AN: 1461874Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000146 AC XY: 106AN XY: 727242
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
238
AN:
1461874
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
106
AN XY:
727242
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00139 AC: 212AN: 152274Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00121 AC XY: 90AN XY: 74450
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
212
AN:
152274
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
90
AN XY:
74450
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jan 19, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Apr 03, 2012 | Thr568Thr in exon 16 of PRKAG2: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located wit hin the splice consensus sequence, and it has been identified in 0.45% (17/3738) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequ encing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs138167675) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 12, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Dec 21, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Oct 15, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Feb 08, 2023 | - - |
Wolff-Parkinson-White pattern Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 6 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | - - |
Lethal congenital glycogen storage disease of heart Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 24, 2024 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 08, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at