rs138172035

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP6BS1BS2

The NM_053025.4(MYLK):c.1968G>T(p.Trp656Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00219 in 1,614,048 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0014 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0023 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

MYLK
NM_053025.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:9O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.61

Variant links:

Genes affected

MYLK (HGNC:7590): (myosin light chain kinase) This gene, a muscle member of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily, encodes myosin light chain kinase which is a calcium/calmodulin dependent enzyme. This kinase phosphorylates myosin regulatory light chains to facilitate myosin interaction with actin filaments to produce contractile activity. This gene encodes both smooth muscle and nonmuscle isoforms. In addition, using a separate promoter in an intron in the 3' region, it encodes telokin, a small protein identical in sequence to the C-terminus of myosin light chain kinase, that is independently expressed in smooth muscle and functions to stabilize unphosphorylated myosin filaments. A pseudogene is located on the p arm of chromosome 3. Four transcript variants that produce four isoforms of the calcium/calmodulin dependent enzyme have been identified as well as two transcripts that produce two isoforms of telokin. Additional variants have been identified but lack full length transcripts. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

MYLK links:

ENSG00000288806 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000288806 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP6

Variant 3-123708870-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-123708870-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 342893.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1, not_provided=1}. Variant chr3-123708870-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00142 (216/152208) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00235 (160/68010). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00205. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 95 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 5 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MYLK	NM_053025.4 link	c.1968G>T	p.Trp656Cys	missense_variant	Exon 15 of 34	ENST00000360304.8	NP_444253.3	Q15746-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
MYLK	ENST00000360304.8 link	c.1968G>T	p.Trp656Cys	missense_variant	Exon 15 of 34	5	NM_053025.4	ENSP00000353452.3		Q15746-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00142

AC:

216

AN:

152090

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000580

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00183

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00235

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000958

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00130

AC:

326

AN:

251486

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00131

AC XY:

178

AN XY:

135918

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000246

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00110

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000817

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000924

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00214

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00228

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00227

AC:

3318

AN:

1461840

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00222

AC XY:

1612

AN XY:

727224

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000269

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00119

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000383

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000939

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000562

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00272

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00219

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00142

AC:

216

AN:

152208

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00128

AC XY:

AN XY:

74424

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000578

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00183

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000415

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00235

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000948

Alfa

AF:

0.00170

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00151

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00270

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00311

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000227

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00267

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00107

AC:

130

EpiCase

AF:

0.00191

EpiControl

AF:

0.00261

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:9Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Aortic aneurysm, familial thoracic 7

Uncertain:2Benign:1Other:1

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

GenomeConnect, ClinGen

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: phenotyping only

GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. -

Mar 30, 2016

Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health and Sciences University

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:3

Sep 27, 2021

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31980526, 21055718) -

Jul 01, 2023

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

MYLK: BP4 -

Mar 14, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection

Benign:2

Apr 25, 2019

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 08, 2020

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not specified

Benign:1

Feb 03, 2020

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: MYLK c.1968G>T (p.Trp656Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the fifth immunoglobulin-like domain (IPR007110) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0013 in 251486 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0021 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 84 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in MYLK causing Aortopathy phenotype (2.5e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. c.1968G>T has been reported in the literature to be found in unaffected controls (Wang_2010). To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Eight clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation, and classified the variant as benign (1x) / likely benign (2x) or VUS (4x). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

MYLK-related disorder

Benign:1

Sep 13, 2023

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Connective tissue disorder

Benign:1

Jun 01, 2018

Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Pathogenic

0.98

BayesDel_addAF

Pathogenic

0.24

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.57

CADD

Pathogenic

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.79

.;.;.;D;.;D

Eigen

Pathogenic

1.0

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.87

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.99

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.96

.;D;D;D;.;.

M_CAP

Pathogenic

0.68

MetaRNN

Uncertain

0.63

D;D;D;D;D;D

MetaSVM

Pathogenic

1.1

MutationAssessor

Pathogenic

4.5

H;.;H;H;.;H

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.61

PROVEAN

Pathogenic

-6.9

D;.;D;D;D;D

REVEL

Pathogenic

0.96

Sift

Pathogenic

0.0

D;.;D;D;D;D

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0

D;D;D;D;D;D

Polyphen

1.0

D;D;D;D;D;D

Vest4

0.97

MutPred

0.90

Gain of disorder (P = 0.0307);.;Gain of disorder (P = 0.0307);Gain of disorder (P = 0.0307);.;Gain of disorder (P = 0.0307);

MVP

0.95

MPC

0.25

ClinPred

0.25

GERP RS

4.6

Varity_R

0.77

gMVP

0.92

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over