rs138185038

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_005422.4(TECTA):c.2418G>A(p.Leu806Leu) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00101 in 1,614,202 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0013 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00098 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

TECTA
NM_005422.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.26

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

TECTA (HGNC:11720): (tectorin alpha) The tectorial membrane is an extracellular matrix of the inner ear that contacts the stereocilia bundles of specialized sensory hair cells. Sound induces movement of these hair cells relative to the tectorial membrane, deflects the stereocilia, and leads to fluctuations in hair-cell membrane potential, transducing sound into electrical signals. Alpha-tectorin is one of the major noncollagenous components of the tectorial membrane. Mutations in the TECTA gene have been shown to be responsible for autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing impairment and a recessive form of sensorineural pre-lingual non-syndromic deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

TECTA links:

TBCEL-TECTA (HGNC:54857): (TBCEL-TECTA readthrough) Predicted to enable alpha-tubulin binding activity. Predicted to be involved in microtubule cytoskeleton organization; post-chaperonin tubulin folding pathway; and tubulin complex assembly. Predicted to be active in cytoplasm. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

TBCEL-TECTA links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.49).

BP6

Variant 11-121129688-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-121129688-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 227994.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00126 (192/152310) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00163 (111/68032). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00138. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 112 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 5 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TECTA	NM_005422.4 link	c.2418G>A	p.Leu806Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 24	ENST00000392793.6	NP_005413.2	O75443
TBCEL-TECTA	NM_001378761.1 link	c.3375G>A	p.Leu1125Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 16 of 30		NP_001365690.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TECTA	ENST00000392793.6 link	c.2418G>A	p.Leu806Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 24	5	NM_005422.4	ENSP00000376543.1	O75443
TECTA	ENST00000264037.2 link	c.2418G>A	p.Leu806Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 23	1		ENSP00000264037.2	O75443
TECTA	ENST00000642222.1 link	c.2418G>A	p.Leu806Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 24			ENSP00000493855.1	A0A2R8YDL0

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00126

AC:

192

AN:

152192

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000121

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00697

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00163

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000957

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00137

AC:

344

AN:

251466

AF XY:

0.00123

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000867

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000992

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00702

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00158

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00130

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000982

AC:

1435

AN:

1461892

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00102

AC XY:

745

AN XY:

727248

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000299

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000894

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.0000765

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00694

AC:

371

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000904

AC:

1005

AN:

1112010

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000861

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.487

Heterozygous variant carriers

192

287

383

479

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00126

AC:

192

AN:

152310

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00150

AC XY:

112

AN XY:

74484

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000120

AC:

AN:

41562

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15300

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00697

AC:

AN:

10616

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00163

AC:

111

AN:

68032

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000947

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.487

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00177

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000552

EpiCase

AF:

0.000600

EpiControl

AF:

0.000652

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Oct 01, 2023

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

TECTA: BP4, BP7 -

Dec 25, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 04, 2021

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 21

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified

Benign:1

Apr 30, 2012

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Leu806Leu in Exon 09 of TECTA: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.1% (8/7020) of Euro pean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs138185038). -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 12

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.49

CADD

Benign

7.6

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.75

PhyloP100

4.3

PromoterAI

-0.020

Neutral

(source)

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.090

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over