rs1383180
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_153717.3(EVC):c.1727G>A(p.Arg576Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.346 in 1,613,550 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 99,274 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R576L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_153717.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVC | NM_153717.3 | c.1727G>A | p.Arg576Gln | missense_variant | 12/21 | ENST00000264956.11 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVC | ENST00000264956.11 | c.1727G>A | p.Arg576Gln | missense_variant | 12/21 | 1 | NM_153717.3 | P1 | |
CRMP1 | ENST00000506216.5 | n.1648-35403C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.321 AC: 48777AN: 151962Hom.: 8380 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.349 AC: 87463AN: 250448Hom.: 16091 AF XY: 0.342 AC XY: 46258AN XY: 135398
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.349 AC: 509331AN: 1461470Hom.: 90894 Cov.: 54 AF XY: 0.345 AC XY: 250549AN XY: 727026
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.321 AC: 48781AN: 152080Hom.: 8380 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.319 AC XY: 23692AN XY: 74344
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Ellis-van Creveld syndrome Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 30, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Ellis-van Creveld syndrome;C0457013:Curry-Hall syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Curry-Hall syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 30, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at