rs138418906

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001376.5(DYNC1H1):​c.1587C>T​(p.Asn529Asn) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000494 in 1,614,104 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0028 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00025 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

DYNC1H1
NM_001376.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.584

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DYNC1H1 (HGNC:2961): (dynein cytoplasmic 1 heavy chain 1) Dyneins are a group of microtubule-activated ATPases that function as molecular motors. They are divided into two subgroups of axonemal and cytoplasmic dyneins. The cytoplasmic dyneins function in intracellular motility, including retrograde axonal transport, protein sorting, organelle movement, and spindle dynamics. Molecules of conventional cytoplasmic dynein are comprised of 2 heavy chain polypeptides and a number of intermediate and light chains.This gene encodes a member of the cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain family. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]
DYNC1H1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal dominant childhood-onset proximal spinal muscular atrophy without contractures
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp
  • intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 13
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
  • autosomal dominant non-syndromic intellectual disability
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.61).
BP6
Variant 14-101985812-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-101985812-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 377816.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.584 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00284 (432/152220) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0103 (426/41536). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00945. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 200 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 432 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DYNC1H1NM_001376.5 linkc.1587C>T p.Asn529Asn synonymous_variant Exon 8 of 78 ENST00000360184.10 NP_001367.2 Q14204

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DYNC1H1ENST00000360184.10 linkc.1587C>T p.Asn529Asn synonymous_variant Exon 8 of 78 1 NM_001376.5 ENSP00000348965.4 Q14204

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00283
AC:
431
AN:
152102
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0103
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000724
AC:
182
AN:
251458
AF XY:
0.000500
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0104
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000260
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000264
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000250
AC:
365
AN:
1461884
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000221
AC XY:
161
AN XY:
727242
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00914
AC:
306
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000313
AC:
14
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53416
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000347
AC:
2
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000899
AC:
10
AN:
1112008
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000546
AC:
33
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.483
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
24
49
73
98
122
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00284
AC:
432
AN:
152220
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00269
AC XY:
200
AN XY:
74422
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0103
AC:
426
AN:
41536
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000327
AC:
5
AN:
15290
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10596
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000147
AC:
1
AN:
68014
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2106
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.495
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
23
45
68
90
113
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00137
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00312
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Apr 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

DYNC1H1: BP4, BP7, BS1 -

Oct 25, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 13, 2020
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2
Oct 13, 2017
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 14, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jan 25, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
-
Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
May 15, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.61
CADD
Benign
0.61
DANN
Benign
0.62
PhyloP100
-0.58
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs138418906; hg19: chr14-102452149; API