rs138450923
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2
The NM_004484.4(GPC3):c.660C>T(p.Ser220Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000832 in 1,209,627 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 302 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004484.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPC3 | NM_004484.4 | c.660C>T | p.Ser220Ser | synonymous_variant | 3/8 | ENST00000370818.8 | NP_004475.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPC3 | ENST00000370818.8 | c.660C>T | p.Ser220Ser | synonymous_variant | 3/8 | 1 | NM_004484.4 | ENSP00000359854.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000483 AC: 54AN: 111782Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.000324 AC XY: 11AN XY: 33980
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000418 AC: 76AN: 182012Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000476 AC XY: 32AN XY: 67296
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000868 AC: 953AN: 1097792Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000801 AC XY: 291AN XY: 363154
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000474 AC: 53AN: 111835Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.000323 AC XY: 11AN XY: 34043
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2024 | GPC3: BP4, BP7, BS2 - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Sep 23, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 22, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 20, 2017 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
GPC3-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | May 11, 2022 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Wilms tumor 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 04, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at