rs138477419

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1

The NM_005422.4(TECTA):c.4611C>T(p.Pro1537Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000103 in 1,614,158 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00053 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000059 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

TECTA
NM_005422.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.40

Variant links:

Genes affected

TECTA (HGNC:11720): (tectorin alpha) The tectorial membrane is an extracellular matrix of the inner ear that contacts the stereocilia bundles of specialized sensory hair cells. Sound induces movement of these hair cells relative to the tectorial membrane, deflects the stereocilia, and leads to fluctuations in hair-cell membrane potential, transducing sound into electrical signals. Alpha-tectorin is one of the major noncollagenous components of the tectorial membrane. Mutations in the TECTA gene have been shown to be responsible for autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing impairment and a recessive form of sensorineural pre-lingual non-syndromic deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

TECTA links:

TBCEL-TECTA (HGNC:54857): (TBCEL-TECTA readthrough) Predicted to enable alpha-tubulin binding activity. Predicted to be involved in microtubule cytoskeleton organization; post-chaperonin tubulin folding pathway; and tubulin complex assembly. Predicted to be active in cytoplasm. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

TBCEL-TECTA links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.37).

BP6

Variant 11-121158146-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-121158146-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 178540.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.4 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000525 (80/152346) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00188 (78/41588). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00154. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 35 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TECTA	NM_005422.4 link	c.4611C>T	p.Pro1537Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 14 of 24	ENST00000392793.6	NP_005413.2	O75443
TBCEL-TECTA	NM_001378761.1 link	c.5568C>T	p.Pro1856Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 20 of 30		NP_001365690.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TECTA	ENST00000392793.6 link	c.4611C>T	p.Pro1537Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 14 of 24	5	NM_005422.4	ENSP00000376543.1		O75443

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000526

AC:

AN:

152228

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00188

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000163

AC:

AN:

251424

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000103

AC XY:

AN XY:

135884

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00209

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000173

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000588

AC:

AN:

1461812

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000495

AC XY:

AN XY:

727206

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00218

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000157

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

8.99e-7

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000828

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000525

AC:

AN:

152346

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000470

AC XY:

AN XY:

74494

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00188

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000592

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000684

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

Apr 30, 2012

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Pro1537Pro in Exon 13 of TECTA: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.3% (10/3738) of Af rican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs138477419). -

Sep 28, 2018

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 21

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Dec 05, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 12

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.37

CADD

Benign

8.7

DANN

Benign

0.75

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over