rs138502859

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_002473.6(MYH9):c.1158C>T(p.Thr386Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00105 in 1,613,820 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0013 ( 3 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 11 hom. )

Consequence

MYH9
NM_002473.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.42

Variant links:

Genes affected

MYH9 (HGNC:7579): (myosin heavy chain 9) This gene encodes a conventional non-muscle myosin; this protein should not be confused with the unconventional myosin-9a or 9b (MYO9A or MYO9B). The encoded protein is a myosin IIA heavy chain that contains an IQ domain and a myosin head-like domain which is involved in several important functions, including cytokinesis, cell motility and maintenance of cell shape. Defects in this gene have been associated with non-syndromic sensorineural deafness autosomal dominant type 17, Epstein syndrome, Alport syndrome with macrothrombocytopenia, Sebastian syndrome, Fechtner syndrome and macrothrombocytopenia with progressive sensorineural deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]

MYH9 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.48).

BP6

Variant 22-36318276-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-36318276-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 164460.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-36318276-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.42 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00126 (192/151962) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00418 (64/15296). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00336. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 90 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 192 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MYH9	NM_002473.6 link	c.1158C>T	p.Thr386Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 41	ENST00000216181.11	NP_002464.1	P35579-1A0A024R1N1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
MYH9	ENST00000216181.11 link	c.1158C>T	p.Thr386Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 41	1	NM_002473.6	ENSP00000216181.6		P35579-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00126

AC:

192

AN:

151842

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000438

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00412

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000864

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00145

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.0285

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00123

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00383

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00119

AC:

298

AN:

251436

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00128

AC XY:

174

AN XY:

135908

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000369

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00162

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00198

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00144

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00132

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00358

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00103

AC:

1504

AN:

1461858

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00108

AC XY:

784

AN XY:

727228

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00146

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00152

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00145

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00146

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000375

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000817

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00217

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00126

AC:

192

AN:

151962

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00121

AC XY:

AN XY:

74296

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000436

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00418

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.000864

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00145

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00123

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00379

Alfa

AF:

0.00119

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00119

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00202

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00229

EpiControl

AF:

0.00213

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:11

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:7

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2021

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 23, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 01, 2022

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

MYH9: BS1, BS2 -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

MYH9-related disorder

Benign:2

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

May 22, 2023

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

not specified

Benign:1

Apr 30, 2012

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Thr386Thr in exon 11 of MYH9: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.1% (89/66688) of E uropean chromosomes and in 0.1% (22/16502) of South Asian chromosomes by the Exo me Aggregation Consortium(http://exac.broadinstitute.org/; dbSNP rs138502859). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.48

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.88

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over