rs138511448

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_018139.3(DNAAF2):​c.1687G>T​(p.Ala563Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000119 in 1,614,036 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A563A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00024 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

DNAAF2
NM_018139.3 missense

Scores

19

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.459
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNAAF2 (HGNC:20188): (dynein axonemal assembly factor 2) This gene encodes a highly conserved protein involved in the preassembly of dynein arm complexes which power cilia. These complexes are found in some cilia and are assembled in the cytoplasm prior to transport for cilia formation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary ciliary dyskinesia. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0070343316).
BP6
Variant 14-49633463-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-49633463-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 313277.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000243 (37/152324) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00618 (32/5182). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00449. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 19 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DNAAF2NM_018139.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1687G>T p.Ala563Ser missense_variant 1/3 ENST00000298292.13
DNAAF2NM_001083908.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1687G>T p.Ala563Ser missense_variant 1/2
DNAAF2NM_001378453.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.-205+20G>T intron_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DNAAF2ENST00000298292.13 linkuse as main transcriptc.1687G>T p.Ala563Ser missense_variant 1/31 NM_018139.3 P2Q9NVR5-1
DNAAF2ENST00000406043.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1687G>T p.Ala563Ser missense_variant 1/21 A2Q9NVR5-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000237
AC:
36
AN:
152206
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00597
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000828
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000350
AC:
88
AN:
251114
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000295
AC XY:
40
AN XY:
135728
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00435
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000261
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000106
AC:
155
AN:
1461712
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000111
AC XY:
81
AN XY:
727138
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00292
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000325
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
8.99e-7
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000166
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000243
AC:
37
AN:
152324
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000255
AC XY:
19
AN XY:
74492
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00618
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000829
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000178
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000234
ExAC
AF:
0.000313
AC:
38
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpNov 20, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 09, 2017This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 10 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
DNAAF2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesApr 29, 2022This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.074
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.57
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.58
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.95
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.00027
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.87
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.74
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.30
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.47
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.012
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0070
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.96
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.55
N;N
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.31
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.48
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.018
Sift
Benign
0.043
D;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.26
T;T
Polyphen
0.0010
B;B
Vest4
0.043
MVP
0.16
MPC
0.47
ClinPred
0.049
T
GERP RS
1.5
Varity_R
0.067
gMVP
0.25

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.040
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs138511448; hg19: chr14-50100181; COSMIC: COSV100023944; COSMIC: COSV100023944; API