rs138519829

Variant names:

• chr4-54289012-C-T
• rs138519829
• NM_006206.6:c.2778C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BP7 BS2

The NM_006206.6(PDGFRA):​c.2778C>T​(p.Tyr926Tyr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00308 in 1,604,072 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 30 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0036 (6 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0030 (24 hom.)
• Consequence: PDGFRA NM_006206.6 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.371

Genes affected

PDGFRA (HGNC:8803): (platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha) This gene encodes a cell surface tyrosine kinase receptor for members of the platelet-derived growth factor family. These growth factors are mitogens for cells of mesenchymal origin. The identity of the growth factor bound to a receptor monomer determines whether the functional receptor is a homodimer or a heterodimer, composed of both platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha and beta polypeptides. Studies suggest that this gene plays a role in organ development, wound healing, and tumor progression. Mutations in this gene have been associated with idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome, somatic and familial gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and a variety of other cancers. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]

ENSG00000282278 (HGNC:):

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.48).
• BP6: Variant 4-54289012-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-54289012-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 220817.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr4-54289012-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr4-54289012-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.371 with no splicing effect.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAd4 at 551 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PDGFRA	NM_006206.6	c.2778C>T	p.Tyr926Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 21 of 23	ENST00000257290.10	NP_006197.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PDGFRA	ENST00000257290.10	c.2778C>T	p.Tyr926Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 21 of 23	1	NM_006206.6	ENSP00000257290.5
ENSG00000282278	ENST00000507166.5	c.2058C>T	p.Tyr686Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 22 of 24	2		ENSP00000423325.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00364 AC: 553 AN: 152090 Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.000410

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000131

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.000193

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00311

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.0302

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.00288

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.000959

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00416 AC: 1044 AN: 251196 Hom.: 10 AF XY: 0.00429 AC XY: 582 AN XY: 135758

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.000431

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000376

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00242

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.0291

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.00264

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00326

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00303 AC: 4393 AN: 1451864 Hom.: 24 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.00300 AC XY: 2172 AN XY: 722998

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.000451

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000537

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.0000383

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00247

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.0286

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00225

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00211

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00362 AC: 551 AN: 152208 Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00462 AC XY: 344 AN XY: 74396

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.000409

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.000194

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00290

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.0302

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.00287

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.000949

Alfa AF: 0.00227 Hom.: 1

Bravo AF: 0.00119

Asia WGS AF: 0.00115 AC: 5 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.00311

EpiControl AF: 0.00178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:10

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5

Dec 05, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2021

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

PDGFRA: BP4, BP7 -

-

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor Benign:2

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

not specified Benign:1

-

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1

Sep 19, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.48
CADD	Benign	0.35
DANN	Benign	0.41

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.010		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs138519829; hg19: chr4-55155179; COSMIC: COSV57270746;