rs138639741

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):ā€‹c.9681A>Gā€‹(p.Lys3227=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000483 in 1,614,106 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0024 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00029 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

DNAH5
NM_001369.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.487
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNAH5 (HGNC:2950): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 5) This gene encodes a dynein protein, which is part of a microtubule-associated motor protein complex consisting of heavy, light, and intermediate chains. This protein is an axonemal heavy chain dynein. It functions as a force-generating protein with ATPase activity, whereby the release of ADP is thought to produce the force-producing power stroke. Mutations in this gene cause primary ciliary dyskinesia type 3, as well as Kartagener syndrome, which are both diseases due to ciliary defects. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).
BP6
Variant 5-13769540-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-13769540-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 258070.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr5-13769540-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.487 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00237 (361/152324) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00844 (351/41568). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00772. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 177 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
DNAH5NM_001369.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.9681A>G p.Lys3227= synonymous_variant 57/79 ENST00000265104.5 NP_001360.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DNAH5ENST00000265104.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.9681A>G p.Lys3227= synonymous_variant 57/791 NM_001369.3 ENSP00000265104 P4
DNAH5ENST00000681290.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.9636A>G p.Lys3212= synonymous_variant 57/79 ENSP00000505288 A1
DNAH5ENST00000504001.3 linkuse as main transcriptn.393A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 3/55

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00237
AC:
360
AN:
152206
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00844
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000458
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000692
AC:
174
AN:
251322
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000530
AC XY:
72
AN XY:
135828
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00880
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000636
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000616
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000326
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000287
AC:
419
AN:
1461782
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000246
AC XY:
179
AN XY:
727202
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00959
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000716
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000261
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000563
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00237
AC:
361
AN:
152324
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00238
AC XY:
177
AN XY:
74500
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00844
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000457
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.00131
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00269
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 23, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 03, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJul 01, 2022DNAH5: BP4, BP7 -
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.56
CADD
Benign
3.3
DANN
Benign
0.61

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs138639741; hg19: chr5-13769649; COSMIC: COSV99448566; API