rs138661755

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_017890.5(VPS13B):​c.2760A>G​(p.Leu920Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00189 in 1,613,226 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 15 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0017 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0019 ( 13 hom. )

Consequence

VPS13B
NM_017890.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.46

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
VPS13B (HGNC:2183): (vacuolar protein sorting 13 homolog B) This gene encodes a potential transmembrane protein that may function in vesicle-mediated transport and sorting of proteins within the cell. This protein may play a role in the development and the function of the eye, hematological system, and central nervous system. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Cohen syndrome. Multiple splice variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
VPS13B Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Cohen syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Myriad Women’s Health, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.5).
BP6
Variant 8-99275190-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-99275190-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 361049.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.46 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00169 (257/152172) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00579 (28/4832). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00412. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 135 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_017890.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
VPS13B
NM_017890.5
MANE Plus Clinical
c.2760A>Gp.Leu920Leu
synonymous
Exon 19 of 62NP_060360.3
VPS13B
NM_152564.5
MANE Select
c.2760A>Gp.Leu920Leu
synonymous
Exon 19 of 62NP_689777.3

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
VPS13B
ENST00000358544.7
TSL:1 MANE Plus Clinical
c.2760A>Gp.Leu920Leu
synonymous
Exon 19 of 62ENSP00000351346.2
VPS13B
ENST00000357162.7
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.2760A>Gp.Leu920Leu
synonymous
Exon 19 of 62ENSP00000349685.2
VPS13B
ENST00000355155.6
TSL:1
n.2760A>G
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 19 of 28ENSP00000347281.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00169
AC:
257
AN:
152054
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00393
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0141
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00579
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00526
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00258
AC:
648
AN:
251336
AF XY:
0.00294
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000369
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00283
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0141
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00180
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00326
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00192
AC:
2799
AN:
1461054
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00216
AC XY:
1568
AN XY:
726832
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000239
AC:
8
AN:
33464
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00347
AC:
155
AN:
44704
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0128
AC:
334
AN:
26106
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39582
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00589
AC:
508
AN:
86178
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000131
AC:
7
AN:
53378
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00330
AC:
19
AN:
5764
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00146
AC:
1628
AN:
1111536
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00232
AC:
140
AN:
60342
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.458
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
140
280
421
561
701
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
70
140
210
280
350
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00169
AC:
257
AN:
152172
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00181
AC XY:
135
AN XY:
74400
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000241
AC:
10
AN:
41548
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00393
AC:
60
AN:
15282
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0141
AC:
49
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00579
AC:
28
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10552
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00144
AC:
98
AN:
67988
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00521
AC:
11
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.507
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
13
26
39
52
65
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00244
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00181
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00173
AC:
6
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:6
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 16, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

May 14, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

VPS13B: BP4, BP7

Cohen syndrome Benign:4
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease.

Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

May 18, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 22, 2019
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:3
Dec 30, 2016
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 04, 2018
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Aug 17, 2016
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

VPS13B-related disorder Benign:1
Sep 18, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.50
CADD
Benign
6.2
DANN
Benign
0.78
PhyloP100
1.5
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs138661755; hg19: chr8-100287418; API