rs138708621
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 1P and 9B. PP3BP4BS1BS2
The NM_001290043.2(TAP2):c.701T>A(p.Leu234Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000611 in 1,613,108 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001290043.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- MHC class I deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
- MHC class I deficiency 1Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001290043.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAP2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.701T>A | p.Leu234Gln | missense | Exon 4 of 12 | ENSP00000364032.3 | Q03519-1 | ||
| ENSG00000250264 | TSL:2 | c.701T>A | p.Leu234Gln | missense | Exon 4 of 15 | ENSP00000391806.2 | E7ENX8 | ||
| TAP2 | c.701T>A | p.Leu234Gln | missense | Exon 4 of 13 | ENSP00000513734.1 | A0A8V8TNJ0 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000309 AC: 47AN: 152202Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000219 AC: 54AN: 246632 AF XY: 0.000268 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000643 AC: 939AN: 1460788Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000627 AC XY: 456AN XY: 726710 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000309 AC: 47AN: 152320Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000215 AC XY: 16AN XY: 74486 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at