rs138885901

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 2P and 8B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1

The NM_194248.3(OTOF):c.1035C>T(p.Tyr345Tyr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000171 in 1,611,752 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00017 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00017 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

OTOF
NM_194248.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.59

Variant links:

Genes affected

OTOF (HGNC:8515): (otoferlin) Mutations in this gene are a cause of neurosensory nonsyndromic recessive deafness, DFNB9. The short form of the encoded protein has 3 C2 domains, a single carboxy-terminal transmembrane domain found also in the C. elegans spermatogenesis factor FER-1 and human dysferlin, while the long form has 6 C2 domains. The homology suggests that this protein may be involved in vesicle membrane fusion. Several transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

OTOF links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.46).

BP6

Variant 2-26489221-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-26489221-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 178513.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.59 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000171 (250/1459392) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.00226 (13/5760). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00133. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 148 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
OTOF	NM_194248.3 link	c.1035C>T	p.Tyr345Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 47	ENST00000272371.7	NP_919224.1	Q9HC10-1
OTOF	NM_001287489.2 link	c.1035C>T	p.Tyr345Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 46		NP_001274418.1	Q9HC10-5

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
OTOF	ENST00000272371.7 link	c.1035C>T	p.Tyr345Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 47	1	NM_194248.3	ENSP00000272371.2		Q9HC10-1
OTOF	ENST00000403946.7 link	c.1035C>T	p.Tyr345Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 46	5		ENSP00000385255.3		Q9HC10-5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000171

AC:

AN:

152242

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000288

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000620

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000235

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000234

AC:

AN:

247926

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000290

AC XY:

AN XY:

134482

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000100

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000363

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000394

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000330

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000171

AC:

250

AN:

1459392

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000204

AC XY:

148

AN XY:

725882

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.000306

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000303

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000162

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000365

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000171

AC:

AN:

152360

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000228

AC XY:

AN XY:

74512

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000240

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000261

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.000288

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000621

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000235

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000269

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000166

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000818

EpiControl

AF:

0.000832

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 30, 2012

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Tyr345Tyr in exon 11 of OTOF: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 33/55378 European ch romosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (http://exac.broadinstitute.org/va riant; dbSNP rs138885901). -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 9

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.46

CADD

Benign

9.4

DANN

Benign

0.56

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over