rs138914618

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_005422.4(TECTA):c.1812C>T(p.Ser604Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000329 in 1,614,186 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0018 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00017 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

TECTA
NM_005422.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.17

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

TECTA (HGNC:11720): (tectorin alpha) The tectorial membrane is an extracellular matrix of the inner ear that contacts the stereocilia bundles of specialized sensory hair cells. Sound induces movement of these hair cells relative to the tectorial membrane, deflects the stereocilia, and leads to fluctuations in hair-cell membrane potential, transducing sound into electrical signals. Alpha-tectorin is one of the major noncollagenous components of the tectorial membrane. Mutations in the TECTA gene have been shown to be responsible for autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing impairment and a recessive form of sensorineural pre-lingual non-syndromic deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

TECTA links:

TBCEL-TECTA (HGNC:54857): (TBCEL-TECTA readthrough) Predicted to enable alpha-tubulin binding activity. Predicted to be involved in microtubule cytoskeleton organization; post-chaperonin tubulin folding pathway; and tubulin complex assembly. Predicted to be active in cytoplasm. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

TBCEL-TECTA links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).

BP6

Variant 11-121127789-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-121127789-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 165353.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.17 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00184 (280/152330) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0064 (266/41586). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00576. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 132 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TECTA	NM_005422.4 link	c.1812C>T	p.Ser604Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 24	ENST00000392793.6	NP_005413.2	O75443
TBCEL-TECTA	NM_001378761.1 link	c.2769C>T	p.Ser923Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 15 of 30		NP_001365690.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TECTA	ENST00000392793.6 link	c.1812C>T	p.Ser604Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 24	5	NM_005422.4	ENSP00000376543.1	O75443
TECTA	ENST00000264037.2 link	c.1812C>T	p.Ser604Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 8 of 23	1		ENSP00000264037.2	O75443
TECTA	ENST00000642222.1 link	c.1812C>T	p.Ser604Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 9 of 24			ENSP00000493855.1	A0A2R8YDL0

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00185

AC:

281

AN:

152212

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00644

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000416

AC:

104

AN:

250266

AF XY:

0.000295

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00561

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000266

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000172

AC:

251

AN:

1461856

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000161

AC XY:

117

AN XY:

727228

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00573

AC:

192

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000402

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000116

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53390

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000520

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000899

AC:

AN:

1112006

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000447

AC:

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.475

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00184

AC:

280

AN:

152330

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00177

AC XY:

132

AN XY:

74478

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00640

AC:

266

AN:

41586

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000654

AC:

AN:

15298

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5180

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10616

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

68034

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000473

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.502

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000835

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00210

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

May 29, 2018

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 31, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 13, 2021

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Nucleotide substitution has no predicted effect on splicing and is not conserved across species -

not specified

Benign:2

Apr 30, 2012

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Ser604Ser in Exon 08 of TECTA: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.7% (26/3738) of Afr ican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs138914618). -

Nov 15, 2017

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.56

CADD

Benign

2.8

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.90

PhyloP100

-3.2

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.030

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over