rs139074266

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The ENST00000381128.2(AIPL1):n.*2264C>T variant causes a non coding transcript exon change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00755 in 152,336 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0075 ( 13 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 ( 0 hom. )

Failed GnomAD Quality Control

Consequence

AIPL1
ENST00000381128.2 non_coding_transcript_exon

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.507

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

AIPL1 (HGNC:359): (aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein like 1) Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) is the most severe inherited retinopathy with the earliest age of onset and accounts for at least 5% of all inherited retinal diseases. Affected individuals are diagnosed at birth or in the first few months of life with nystagmus, severely impaired vision or blindness and an abnormal or flat electroretinogram. The photoreceptor/pineal-expressed gene, AIPL1, encoding aryl-hydrocarbon interacting protein-like 1, is located within the LCA4 candidate region. The encoded protein contains three tetratricopeptide motifs, consistent with chaperone or nuclear transport activity. Mutations in this gene may cause approximately 20% of recessive LCA. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2014]

AIPL1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

AIPL1-related retinopathy
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Leber congenital amaurosis 4
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
Leber congenital amaurosis
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

AIPL1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.97).

BP6

Variant 17-6424223-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-6424223-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 324580.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submission is: [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00755 (1150/152336) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0263 (1095/41574). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.025. There are 13 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 539 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 13 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
AIPL1	NM_014336.5 link	c.*1237C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 6 of 6	ENST00000381129.8	NP_055151.3	Q9NZN9-1F1T0B6

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
AIPL1	ENST00000381129.8 link	c.*1237C>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 6 of 6	1	NM_014336.5	ENSP00000370521.3		Q9NZN9-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00752

AC:

1145

AN:

152218

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0263

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00268

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000103

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00287

GnomAD4 exome

Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

100

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

South Asian (SAS)

AC:

AN:

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00755

AC:

1150

AN:

152336

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00724

AC XY:

539

AN XY:

74492

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0263

AC:

1095

AN:

41574

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00268

AC:

AN:

15304

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5184

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10626

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000103

AC:

AN:

68038

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00284

AC:

AN:

2110

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.498

Heterozygous variant carriers

120

180

240

300

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Alfa

AF:

0.0000703

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00915

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00173

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Leber congenital amaurosis 4

Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Retinitis Pigmentosa, Recessive

Benign:1

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Retinitis Pigmentosa, Dominant

Benign:1

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.97

CADD

Benign

1.3

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.28

PhyloP100

-0.51

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

rs139074266

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over