rs139116481

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001136472.2(LITAF):c.330C>T(p.Asn110Asn) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000917 in 1,614,178 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00063 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00095 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

LITAF
NM_001136472.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.807

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

LITAF (HGNC:16841): (lipopolysaccharide induced TNF factor) Lipopolysaccharide is a potent stimulator of monocytes and macrophages, causing secretion of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and other inflammatory mediators. This gene encodes lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF-alpha factor, which is a DNA-binding protein and can mediate the TNF-alpha expression by direct binding to the promoter region of the TNF-alpha gene. The transcription of this gene is induced by tumor suppressor p53 and has been implicated in the p53-induced apoptotic pathway. Mutations in this gene cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1C (CMT1C) and may be involved in the carcinogenesis of extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD). Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2014]

LITAF Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1C
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen

LITAF links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).

BP6

Variant 16-11553580-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-11553580-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 219573.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.807 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00063 (96/152304) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.00173 (9/5190). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000904. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 41 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 96 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
LITAF	NM_001136472.2 link	c.330C>T	p.Asn110Asn	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 4	ENST00000622633.5	NP_001129944.1	Q99732-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
LITAF	ENST00000622633.5 link	c.330C>T	p.Asn110Asn	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 4	1	NM_001136472.2	ENSP00000483114.1		Q99732-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000631

AC:

AN:

152186

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000217

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00173

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000189

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00103

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000956

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000876

AC:

220

AN:

251180

AF XY:

0.000869

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000123

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000173

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00283

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000278

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00109

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000489

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000947

AC:

1385

AN:

1461874

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000960

AC XY:

698

AN XY:

727238

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000149

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000179

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.0000383

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00106

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000974

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000449

AC:

AN:

53406

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000173

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00106

AC:

1180

AN:

1112010

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000662

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.476

Heterozygous variant carriers

156

234

312

390

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

126

168

210

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000630

AC:

AN:

152304

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000550

AC XY:

AN XY:

74480

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000217

AC:

AN:

41566

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

15298

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00173

AC:

AN:

5190

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000414

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000189

AC:

AN:

10600

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00103

AC:

AN:

68030

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000946

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.507

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000884

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000756

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000872

EpiControl

AF:

0.00101

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:1

Inherited Neuropathy Consortium

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:literature only

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Benign:1

Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1C

Benign:1

Jan 26, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Jul 11, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided

Benign:1

Sep 14, 2020

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 15776429, 19396477) -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.82

CADD

Benign

0.76

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.53

PhyloP100

-0.81

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.020

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over