rs139206262
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_002454.3(MTRR):c.1653G>A(p.Pro551Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00981 in 1,614,060 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 95 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0069 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.010 ( 91 hom. )
Consequence
MTRR
NM_002454.3 synonymous
NM_002454.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.143
Genes affected
MTRR (HGNC:7473): (5-methyltetrahydrofolate-homocysteine methyltransferase reductase) This gene encodes a member of the ferredoxin-NADP(+) reductase (FNR) family of electron transferases. This protein functions in the synthesis of methionine by regenerating methionine synthase to a functional state. Because methionine synthesis requires methyl-group transfer by a folate donor, activity of the encoded enzyme is important for folate metabolism and cellular methylation. Mutations in this gene can cause homocystinuria-megaloblastic anemia, cbl E type. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2015]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).
BP6
Variant 5-7895829-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-7895829-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 203840.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-7895829-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.143 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00693 (1055/152266) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0115 (784/68000). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0109. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 527 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTRR | NM_002454.3 | c.1653G>A | p.Pro551Pro | synonymous_variant | 12/15 | ENST00000440940.7 | NP_002445.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTRR | ENST00000440940.7 | c.1653G>A | p.Pro551Pro | synonymous_variant | 12/15 | 1 | NM_002454.3 | ENSP00000402510.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00695 AC: 1057AN: 152148Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1057
AN:
152148
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00803 AC: 2019AN: 251430Hom.: 11 AF XY: 0.00824 AC XY: 1120AN XY: 135892
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
2019
AN:
251430
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1120
AN XY:
135892
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0101 AC: 14776AN: 1461794Hom.: 91 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0101 AC XY: 7336AN XY: 727192
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
14776
AN:
1461794
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
7336
AN XY:
727192
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00693 AC: 1055AN: 152266Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00708 AC XY: 527AN XY: 74450
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1055
AN:
152266
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
527
AN XY:
74450
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
16
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 03, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | MTRR: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Methylcobalamin deficiency type cblE Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 11, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Disorders of Intracellular Cobalamin Metabolism Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at