rs139211339
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_000053.4(ATP7B):c.2355+13T>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00333 in 1,613,232 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0028 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0034 ( 8 hom. )
Consequence
ATP7B
NM_000053.4 intron
NM_000053.4 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.104
Genes affected
ATP7B (HGNC:870): (ATPase copper transporting beta) This gene is a member of the P-type cation transport ATPase family and encodes a protein with several membrane-spanning domains, an ATPase consensus sequence, a hinge domain, a phosphorylation site, and at least 2 putative copper-binding sites. This protein is a monomer, and functions as a copper-transporting ATPase which exports copper out of the cells, such as the efflux of hepatic copper into the bile. Alternate transcriptional splice variants, encoding different isoforms with distinct cellular localizations, have been characterized. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Wilson disease which is characterized by copper accumulation. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2019]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BP6
Variant 13-51958298-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-51958298-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 157938.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {not_provided=1, Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=4}. Variant chr13-51958298-A-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr13-51958298-A-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATP7B | NM_000053.4 | c.2355+13T>G | intron_variant | ENST00000242839.10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATP7B | ENST00000242839.10 | c.2355+13T>G | intron_variant | 1 | NM_000053.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00283 AC: 431AN: 152188Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
431
AN:
152188
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00288 AC: 717AN: 248902Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00287 AC XY: 388AN XY: 135128
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
717
AN:
248902
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
388
AN XY:
135128
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00339 AC: 4947AN: 1460926Hom.: 8 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00327 AC XY: 2380AN XY: 726836
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
4947
AN:
1460926
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
2380
AN XY:
726836
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00284 AC: 432AN: 152306Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00287 AC XY: 214AN XY: 74478
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
432
AN:
152306
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
214
AN XY:
74478
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:12Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 03, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 08, 2013 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Wilson disease Uncertain:1Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Apr 15, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | May 02, 2019 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Aug 21, 2020 | - - |
not provided Benign:2Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2024 | ATP7B: BS2 - |
not provided, no classification provided | phenotyping only | GenomeConnect, ClinGen | - | Variant interpretted as Likely benign and reported on 09-19-2018 by Lab or GTR ID 239772. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Nov 17, 2016 | Variant summary: The ATP7B c.2355+13T>G variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved intronic nucleotide. One in silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 357/119646 control chromosomes (1 homozygote), predominantly observed in the European (Finnish) subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0062046 (41/6608). This frequency is about the same frequency as the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic ATP7B variant (0.0054006), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of European (Finnish) origin. The variant has been reported in the literature without strong evidence for causality, and in one case was present on the same chromosome as a known pathogenic variant, supporting the benign role of the variant. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at