rs139211339

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_000053.4(ATP7B):​c.2355+13T>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00333 in 1,613,232 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0028 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0034 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

ATP7B
NM_000053.4 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:12O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.104
Variant links:
Genes affected
ATP7B (HGNC:870): (ATPase copper transporting beta) This gene is a member of the P-type cation transport ATPase family and encodes a protein with several membrane-spanning domains, an ATPase consensus sequence, a hinge domain, a phosphorylation site, and at least 2 putative copper-binding sites. This protein is a monomer, and functions as a copper-transporting ATPase which exports copper out of the cells, such as the efflux of hepatic copper into the bile. Alternate transcriptional splice variants, encoding different isoforms with distinct cellular localizations, have been characterized. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Wilson disease which is characterized by copper accumulation. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2019]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BP6
Variant 13-51958298-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-51958298-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 157938.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {not_provided=1, Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=4}. Variant chr13-51958298-A-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr13-51958298-A-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
ATP7BNM_000053.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.2355+13T>G intron_variant ENST00000242839.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
ATP7BENST00000242839.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.2355+13T>G intron_variant 1 NM_000053.4 P1P35670-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00283
AC:
431
AN:
152188
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000724
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00219
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000851
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00461
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00706
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00637
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00419
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00144
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00288
AC:
717
AN:
248902
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.00287
AC XY:
388
AN XY:
135128
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000649
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000608
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00428
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000654
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00617
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00423
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00215
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00339
AC:
4947
AN:
1460926
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00327
AC XY:
2380
AN XY:
726836
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000508
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000581
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00406
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000626
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00563
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00384
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00277
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00284
AC:
432
AN:
152306
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00287
AC XY:
214
AN XY:
74478
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000722
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000850
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00461
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00706
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00420
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.00527
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00204
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:12Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 03, 2018This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoFeb 08, 2013- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Wilson disease Uncertain:1Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Apr 15, 2020- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMay 02, 2019This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesAug 21, 2020- -
not provided Benign:2Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenAug 01, 2024ATP7B: BS2 -
not provided, no classification providedphenotyping onlyGenomeConnect, ClinGen-Variant interpretted as Likely benign and reported on 09-19-2018 by Lab or GTR ID 239772. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpNov 17, 2016Variant summary: The ATP7B c.2355+13T>G variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved intronic nucleotide. One in silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 357/119646 control chromosomes (1 homozygote), predominantly observed in the European (Finnish) subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0062046 (41/6608). This frequency is about the same frequency as the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic ATP7B variant (0.0054006), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of European (Finnish) origin. The variant has been reported in the literature without strong evidence for causality, and in one case was present on the same chromosome as a known pathogenic variant, supporting the benign role of the variant. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.84
CADD
Benign
0.45
DANN
Benign
0.62

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs139211339; hg19: chr13-52532434; API