rs139312489

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2

The NM_144672.4(OTOA):​c.2229C>T​(p.Ala743Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.106 in 141,714 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,123 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.11 ( 1123 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.030 ( 5452 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control

Consequence

OTOA
NM_144672.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.31

Publications

6 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
OTOA (HGNC:16378): (otoancorin) The protein encoded by this gene is specifically expressed in the inner ear, and is located at the interface between the apical surface of the inner ear sensory epithelia and their overlying acellular gels. It is prposed that this protein is involved in the attachment of the inner ear acellular gels to the apical surface of the underlying nonsensory cells. Mutations in this gene are associated with autosomal recessive deafness type 22 (DFNB22). Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]
OTOA Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 22
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • hearing loss, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.65).
BP6
Variant 16-21730858-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-21730858-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 164827.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.31 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 1123 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
OTOANM_144672.4 linkc.2229C>T p.Ala743Ala synonymous_variant Exon 21 of 29 ENST00000646100.2 NP_653273.3 Q05BM7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
OTOAENST00000646100.2 linkc.2229C>T p.Ala743Ala synonymous_variant Exon 21 of 29 NM_144672.4 ENSP00000496564.2 Q7RTW8-5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.106
AC:
14999
AN:
141612
Hom.:
1116
Cov.:
30
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0348
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0738
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.128
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.172
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.232
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.220
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.158
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.157
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.120
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.110
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0305
AC:
7072
AN:
232152
AF XY:
0.0293
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00931
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0340
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0228
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0932
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0206
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0210
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0386
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR
AF:
0.0295
AC:
39417
AN:
1334280
Hom.:
5452
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.0322
AC XY:
21326
AN XY:
661458
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0100
AC:
328
AN:
32716
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0414
AC:
1664
AN:
40218
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0636
AC:
1457
AN:
22926
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.111
AC:
3516
AN:
31668
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0881
AC:
6114
AN:
69382
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0702
AC:
3232
AN:
46072
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0438
AC:
224
AN:
5116
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0200
AC:
20628
AN:
1031850
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0415
AC:
2254
AN:
54332
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD4 Exomes is highly skewed from 0.5 (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.281
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2940
5880
8820
11760
14700
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
172
344
516
688
860
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.106
AC:
15010
AN:
141714
Hom.:
1123
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.110
AC XY:
7556
AN XY:
68698
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0351
AC:
1425
AN:
40550
American (AMR)
AF:
0.128
AC:
1786
AN:
13926
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.172
AC:
548
AN:
3184
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.231
AC:
1013
AN:
4380
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.220
AC:
918
AN:
4170
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.158
AC:
1431
AN:
9082
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.147
AC:
38
AN:
258
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.120
AC:
7570
AN:
63312
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.110
AC:
215
AN:
1958
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5. (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.319
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
783
1565
2348
3130
3913
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
176
352
528
704
880
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.115
Hom.:
278

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Mar 02, 2015
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Ala743Ala in Exon 20 of OTOA: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located wi thin the splice consensus sequence and it has been identified in 0.4% (490/11461 0) of chromosomes including 62 individuals who were homozygous by the Exome Aggr egation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; rs139312489). -

Feb 29, 2016
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 10, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 26, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided Benign:3
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 22 Benign:1
Nov 07, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.65
CADD
Benign
0.070
DANN
Benign
0.76
PhyloP100
-3.3
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.090
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs461179; hg19: chr16-21742179; COSMIC: COSV53748363; API