rs139319087

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_052989.3(IFT122):c.1113C>T(p.Asp371Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000745 in 1,614,130 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0039 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00041 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

IFT122
NM_052989.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.04

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

IFT122 (HGNC:13556): (intraflagellar transport 122) This gene encodes a member of the WD repeat protein family. WD repeats are minimally conserved regions of approximately 40 amino acids typically bracketed by gly-his and trp-asp (GH-WD), which may facilitate formation of heterotrimeric or multiprotein complexes. Members of this family are involved in a variety of cellular processes, including cell cycle progression, signal transduction, apoptosis, and gene regulation. This cytoplasmic protein contains seven WD repeats and an AF-2 domain which function by recruiting coregulatory molecules and in transcriptional activation. Mutations in this gene cause cranioectodermal dysplasia-1. A related pseudogene is located on chromosome 3. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2013]

IFT122 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

cranioectodermal dysplasia 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, G2P, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
cranioectodermal dysplasia
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

IFT122 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.

BP6

Variant 3-129476767-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-129476767-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 461790.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.04 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00395 (601/152256) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0131 (543/41540). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0122. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 292 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
IFT122	NM_052989.3 link	c.1113C>T	p.Asp371Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 30	ENST00000348417.7	NP_443715.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
IFT122	ENST00000348417.7 link	c.1113C>T	p.Asp371Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 30	1	NM_052989.3	ENSP00000324005.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00394

AC:

600

AN:

152138

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0131

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00255

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000192

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000103

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00526

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00103

AC:

260

AN:

251370

AF XY:

0.000773

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0136

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000781

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000528

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000326

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000411

AC:

601

AN:

1461874

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000348

AC XY:

253

AN XY:

727238

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0139

AC:

466

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000894

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000116

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000521

AC:

AN:

5760

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000234

AC:

AN:

1112004

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000927

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.481

Heterozygous variant carriers

124

166

207

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00395

AC:

601

AN:

152256

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00392

AC XY:

292

AN XY:

74438

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0131

AC:

543

AN:

41540

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00255

AC:

AN:

15294

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000193

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4822

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10596

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000103

AC:

AN:

68032

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00521

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.490

Heterozygous variant carriers

106

132

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00223

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00486

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cranioectodermal dysplasia 1

Benign:2

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jan 28, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

May 12, 2021

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.54

CADD

Benign

1.0

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.50

PhyloP100

-1.0

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Mutation Taster

=93/7

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over