rs139337049

chr1-220182277-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_012414.4(RAB3GAP2):c.2290C>T(p.Leu764Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00157 in 1,613,938 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00097 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0016 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

RAB3GAP2
NM_012414.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.46

Variant links:

Genes affected

RAB3GAP2 (HGNC:17168): (RAB3 GTPase activating non-catalytic protein subunit 2) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the RAB3 protein family, members of which are involved in regulated exocytosis of neurotransmitters and hormones. This protein forms the Rab3 GTPase-activating complex with RAB3GAP1, where it constitutes the regulatory subunit, whereas the latter functions as the catalytic subunit. This gene has the highest level of expression in the brain, consistent with it having a key role in neurodevelopment. Mutations in this gene are associated with Martsolf syndrome.[provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

RAB3GAP2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010350466).

BP6

Variant 1-220182277-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-220182277-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 235683.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=5}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000973 (148/152176) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00154 (105/68004). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0013. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 61 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
RAB3GAP2	NM_012414.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.2290C>T	p.Leu764Phe	missense_variant	21/35	ENST00000358951.7

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
RAB3GAP2	ENST00000358951.7 linkuse as main transcript	c.2290C>T	p.Leu764Phe	missense_variant	21/35	1	NM_012414.4	P2	Q9H2M9-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000973

AC:

148

AN:

152058

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000362

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000786

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00288

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000415

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0000945

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00154

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00143

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00103

AC:

260

AN:

251316

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000994

AC XY:

135

AN XY:

135834

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000246

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000434

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00268

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000392

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000462

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00167

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00179

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00163

AC:

2386

AN:

1461762

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00153

AC XY:

1116

AN XY:

727186

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000149

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000402

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00188

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000452

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000936

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00191

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00230

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000973

AC:

148

AN:

152176

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000820

AC XY:

AN XY:

74406

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000361

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000785

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00288

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000415

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.0000945

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00154

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00142

Alfa

AF:

0.00145

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00102

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000270

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00259

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00209

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00106

AC:

129

EpiCase

AF:

0.00174

EpiControl

AF:

0.00148

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:2Benign:1

Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System	-	The RAB3GAP2 p.Leu764Phe variant was not identified in the literature but was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs139337049) and ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Invitae, Illumina, Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago, Fulgent Genetics and Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics). The variant was identified in control databases in 280 of 282664 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0009906 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The variant was observed in the following populations: Ashkenazi Jewish in 28 of 10362 chromosomes (freq: 0.002702), European (non-Finnish) in 206 of 129038 chromosomes (freq: 0.001596), Other in 11 of 7216 chromosomes (freq: 0.001524), Latino in 18 of 35436 chromosomes (freq: 0.000508), South Asian in 12 of 30614 chromosomes (freq: 0.000392), African in 4 of 24946 chromosomes (freq: 0.00016) and European (Finnish) in 1 of 25102 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), but was not observed in the East Asian population. The p.Leu764 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms however four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	May 12, 2021	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics	Jan 21, 2016	- -

Martsolf syndrome;C3280214:Warburg micro syndrome 2

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Dec 22, 2023	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics	Oct 31, 2018	- -

not specified

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Nov 18, 2015

- -

Warburg micro syndrome 2

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Martsolf syndrome

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

RAB3GAP2-related condition

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Feb 03, 2022

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.065

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.54

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.56

Cadd

Benign

Dann

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.034

Eigen

Benign

-0.44

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.25

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.80

LIST_S2

Benign

0.84

M_CAP

Benign

0.0065

MetaRNN

Benign

0.010

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.40

MutationTaster

Benign

0.84

PrimateAI

Benign

0.42

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.4

REVEL

Benign

0.025

Sift

Benign

0.36

Sift4G

Benign

0.37

Polyphen

0.0010

Vest4

0.20

MVP

0.11

MPC

0.16

ClinPred

0.016

GERP RS

2.9

Varity_R

0.12

gMVP

0.44

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over