rs139407567

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PVS1_ModerateBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001302960.2(AIP):c.799C>T(p.Gln267*) variant causes a stop gained change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00103 in 1,612,406 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00058 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

AIP
NM_001302960.2 stop_gained

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:8O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.72

Variant links:

Genes affected

AIP (HGNC:358): (aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein) The protein encoded by this gene is a receptor for aryl hydrocarbons and a ligand-activated transcription factor. The encoded protein is found in the cytoplasm as part of a multiprotein complex, but upon binding of ligand is transported to the nucleus. This protein can regulate the expression of many xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes. Also, the encoded protein can bind specifically to and inhibit the activity of hepatitis B virus. Three transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2014]

AIP links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

PVS1

Loss of function variant, product does not undergo nonsense mediated mRNA decay. Variant is located in the 3'-most exon, not predicted to undergo nonsense mediated mRNA decay. Fraction of 0.0622 CDS is truncated, and there are 1 pathogenic variants in the truncated region.

BP6

Variant 11-67490807-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-67490807-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 41209.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=6, not_provided=1}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000578 (88/152352) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00165 (8/4834). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000823. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 36 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 88 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
AIP	NM_003977.4 link	c.807C>T	p.Phe269Phe	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 6	ENST00000279146.8	NP_003968.3	O00170
AIP	NM_001302960.2 link	c.799C>T	p.Gln267*	stop_gained	Exon 6 of 6		NP_001289889.1	O00170A0A804HJ38
AIP	NM_001302959.2 link	c.630C>T	p.Phe210Phe	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 6		NP_001289888.1	O00170A0A804HKL7

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
AIP	ENST00000279146.8 link	c.807C>T	p.Phe269Phe	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 6	1	NM_003977.4	ENSP00000279146.3		O00170

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000578

AC:

AN:

152234

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000362

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000393

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00165

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000867

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000559

AC:

139

AN:

248838

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000606

AC XY:

AN XY:

135236

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000250

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000686

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000463

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000887

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000657

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00108

AC:

1571

AN:

1460054

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00110

AC XY:

802

AN XY:

726336

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000149

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000358

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000835

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000574

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00128

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000912

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000578

AC:

AN:

152352

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000483

AC XY:

AN XY:

74498

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000361

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000392

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00165

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000867

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000777

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000695

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00104

EpiControl

AF:

0.000474

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:8Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:3Benign:4

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 17, 2019

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 2200621, 26186299, 21753072, 17609395, 28220018, 23038625, 18381572, 25184284, 20506337, 18410548) -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The AIP p.F269F variant was identified in 5 individuals with pituitary adenoma, acromegaly, gigantism, or macroadenoma, however the variant was also identified in unaffected family members (DeSousa_2017_PMID:28220018; Preda_2014_PMID:25184284; Oriola_2012_PMID:23038625; Igreja_2010_PMID:20506337). Functional studies reveal that individuals and in vitro models with this variant have decreased AIP mRNA expression compared to control (Igreja_2010_PMID:20506337). The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs139407567), LOVD 3.0 and ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Ambry Genetics and as likely benign by Illumina and Invitae). The variant was identified in control databases in 154 of 280240 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0005495 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The variant was observed in the following populations: European (non-Finnish) in 112 of 127076 chromosomes (freq: 0.000881), South Asian in 21 of 30602 chromosomes (freq: 0.000686), Other in 4 of 7176 chromosomes (freq: 0.000557), Latino in 10 of 35398 chromosomes (freq: 0.000283), African in 6 of 24736 chromosomes (freq: 0.000243) and European (Finnish) in 1 of 25074 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), but was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, or East Asian populations. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

AIP: BP4, BP7 -

Somatotroph adenoma

Uncertain:1Benign:1Other:1

Dec 21, 2018

Baylor Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. This variant has been previously reported as disease-causing [PMID 18381572, 25184284] -

GeneReviews

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: literature only

- -

Apr 28, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Jun 23, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Mar 20, 2020

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

AIP-related disorder

Benign:1

Aug 25, 2023

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.40

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.88

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over