rs139428292
Variant names:
Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 3P and 1B. PM2PP5BP4
The NM_005105.5(RBM8A):c.-21G>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000688 in 1,452,810 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in Lovd as Pathogenic (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 6.9e-7 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
RBM8A
NM_005105.5 5_prime_UTR
NM_005105.5 5_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.503
Genes affected
RBM8A (HGNC:9905): (RNA binding motif protein 8A) This gene encodes a protein with a conserved RNA-binding motif. The protein is found predominantly in the nucleus, although it is also present in the cytoplasm. It is preferentially associated with mRNAs produced by splicing, including both nuclear mRNAs and newly exported cytoplasmic mRNAs. It is thought that the protein remains associated with spliced mRNAs as a tag to indicate where introns had been present, thus coupling pre- and post-mRNA splicing events. Previously, it was thought that two genes encode this protein, RBM8A and RBM8B; it is now thought that the RBM8B locus is a pseudogene. There are two alternate translation start codons with this gene, which result in two forms of the protein. An allele mutation and a low-frequency noncoding single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in this gene cause thrombocytopenia-absent radius (TAR) syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PP5
Variant 1-145927447-C-A is Pathogenic according to our data. Variant chr1-145927447-C-A is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.61). . Strength limited to SUPPORTING due to the PP5.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBM8A | NM_005105.5 | c.-21G>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 1 of 6 | ENST00000583313.7 | NP_005096.1 | ||
LIX1L-AS1 | NR_147182.1 | n.500C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 2 of 3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBM8A | ENST00000583313.7 | c.-21G>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 1 of 6 | 1 | NM_005105.5 | ENSP00000463058.2 | |||
ENSG00000280778 | ENST00000625258.1 | c.-30+158C>A | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 3 | 5 | ENSP00000487094.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
31
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000420 AC: 1AN: 237842 AF XY: 0.00000780 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
237842
AF XY:
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.88e-7 AC: 1AN: 1452810Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000139 AC XY: 1AN XY: 721650 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
1452810
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
721650
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
33358
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
43248
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
25888
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
39530
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
84552
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
52772
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
1107860
Gnomad4 Remaining exome
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
60098
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
0
1
1
2
2
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
31
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at