rs139429307

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000503.6(EYA1):​c.966+4C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000266 in 1,614,138 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00042 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00025 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

EYA1
NM_000503.6 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0001728
2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.336

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
EYA1 (HGNC:3519): (EYA transcriptional coactivator and phosphatase 1) This gene encodes a member of the eyes absent (EYA) family of proteins. The encoded protein may play a role in the developing kidney, branchial arches, eye, and ear. Mutations of this gene have been associated with branchiootorenal dysplasia syndrome, branchiootic syndrome, and sporadic cases of congenital cataracts and ocular anterior segment anomalies. A similar protein in mice can act as a transcriptional activator. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2013]
EYA1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • branchio-oto-renal syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • branchiootorenal syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • branchiootic syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia
  • branchiootic syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.66).
BP6
Variant 8-71271754-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-71271754-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 363651.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00042 (64/152276) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.012 (62/5172). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0096. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 37 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 64 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
EYA1NM_000503.6 linkc.966+4C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 10 of 17 ENST00000340726.8 NP_000494.2 Q99502-1A0A024R813B3KXR1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
EYA1ENST00000340726.8 linkc.966+4C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 10 of 17 1 NM_000503.6 ENSP00000342626.3 Q99502-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000421
AC:
64
AN:
152158
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0120
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00104
AC:
262
AN:
251468
AF XY:
0.00102
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0138
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000352
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000326
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000250
AC:
366
AN:
1461862
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000241
AC XY:
175
AN XY:
727228
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000299
AC:
1
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000224
AC:
1
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00786
AC:
312
AN:
39694
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000348
AC:
3
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000189
AC:
21
AN:
1111992
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000464
AC:
28
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.483
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
23
45
68
90
113
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000420
AC:
64
AN:
152276
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000497
AC XY:
37
AN XY:
74458
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41574
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0120
AC:
62
AN:
5172
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10600
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000147
AC:
1
AN:
68018
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000473
AC:
1
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.491
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
8
11
15
19
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0000529
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000431
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:1
Mar 21, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

c.966+4C>T in intron 9 of EYA1: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 1.61% (139/8654) of East Asian chro mosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.or g; dbSNP rs139429307). -

Branchiootic syndrome 1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Melnick-Fraser syndrome Benign:1
Dec 12, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
Jul 06, 2020
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Otofaciocervical syndrome 1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Branchiootic syndrome 1;C3714941:Otofaciocervical syndrome 1;C4551702:Branchiootorenal syndrome 1 Benign:1
May 04, 2022
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.66
CADD
Benign
16
DANN
Benign
0.77
PhyloP100
0.34
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00017
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.010
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs139429307; hg19: chr8-72183989; API