rs139429307
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000503.6(EYA1):c.966+4C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000266 in 1,614,138 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000503.6 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- branchio-oto-renal syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- branchiootorenal syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- branchiootic syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia
- branchiootic syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EYA1 | NM_000503.6 | c.966+4C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | Intron 10 of 17 | ENST00000340726.8 | NP_000494.2 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000421 AC: 64AN: 152158Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00104 AC: 262AN: 251468 AF XY: 0.00102 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000250 AC: 366AN: 1461862Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000241 AC XY: 175AN XY: 727228 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000420 AC: 64AN: 152276Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000497 AC XY: 37AN XY: 74458 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
c.966+4C>T in intron 9 of EYA1: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 1.61% (139/8654) of East Asian chro mosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.or g; dbSNP rs139429307). -
Branchiootic syndrome 1 Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Melnick-Fraser syndrome Benign:1
- -
not provided Benign:1
- -
Otofaciocervical syndrome 1 Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Branchiootic syndrome 1;C3714941:Otofaciocervical syndrome 1;C4551702:Branchiootorenal syndrome 1 Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at