rs139437157

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001146079.2(CLDN14):c.621C>T(p.Thr207Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000743 in 1,614,124 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0040 ( 3 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00040 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

CLDN14
NM_001146079.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.33

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CLDN14 (HGNC:2035): (claudin 14) Tight junctions represent one mode of cell-to-cell adhesion in epithelial or endothelial cell sheets, forming continuous seals around cells and serving as a physical barrier to prevent solutes and water from passing freely through the paracellular space. These junctions are comprised of sets of continuous networking strands in the outwardly facing cytoplasmic leaflet, with complementary grooves in the inwardly facing extracytoplasmic leaflet. The protein encoded by this gene, a member of the claudin family, is an integral membrane protein and a component of tight junction strands. The encoded protein also binds specifically to the WW domain of Yes-associated protein. Defects in this gene are the cause of an autosomal recessive form of nonsyndromic sensorineural deafness. It is also reported that four synonymous variants in this gene are associated with kidney stones and reduced bone mineral density. Several transcript variants encoding the same protein have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]

CLDN14 links:

LNCTSI (HGNC:56660): (lncRNA TGF-beta/SMAD3 pathway interacting)

LNCTSI links:

CLDN14-AS1 (HGNC:55953): (CLDN14 antisense RNA 1)

CLDN14-AS1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).

BP6

Variant 21-36461075-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr21-36461075-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 44085.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.34 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00404 (615/152328) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0132 (550/41564). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0123. There are 3 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 295 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CLDN14	NM_001146079.2 link	c.621C>T	p.Thr207Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 2	ENST00000399135.6	NP_001139551.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CLDN14	ENST00000399135.6 link	c.621C>T	p.Thr207Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 2	1	NM_001146079.2	ENSP00000382087.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00404

AC:

615

AN:

152210

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0133

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00353

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00382

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00101

AC:

254

AN:

250932

AF XY:

0.000751

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0121

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00116

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000115

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000327

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000400

AC:

584

AN:

1461796

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000362

AC XY:

263

AN XY:

727178

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0126

AC:

423

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00125

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.000101

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000696

AC:

AN:

86254

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53416

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00139

AC:

AN:

5738

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000261

AC:

AN:

1111968

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000961

AC:

AN:

60384

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.481

Heterozygous variant carriers

118

158

197

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00404

AC:

615

AN:

152328

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00396

AC XY:

295

AN XY:

74500

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0132

AC:

550

AN:

41564

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00353

AC:

AN:

15312

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5180

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10628

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

68026

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00378

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.507

Heterozygous variant carriers

113

150

188

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00173

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00451

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:2

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 28, 2018

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23590985) -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 29

Uncertain:1

Apr 28, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

not specified

Benign:1

Apr 30, 2012

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Thr207Thr in Exon 03 of CLDN14: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 1.2% (43/3738) of Af rican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs139437157). -

CLDN14-related disorder

Benign:1

Jul 15, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.82

CADD

Benign

0.43

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.66

PhyloP100

-2.3

Mutation Taster

=98/2

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over