rs139565013

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_021930.6(RINT1):​c.532T>C​(p.Tyr178His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000394 in 1,602,278 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00041 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00039 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

RINT1
NM_021930.6 missense

Scores

2
17

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.42
Variant links:
Genes affected
RINT1 (HGNC:21876): (RAD50 interactor 1) This gene encodes a protein first identified for its ability to interact with the RAD50 double strand break repair protein, with the resulting interaction implicated in the regulation of cell cycle progression and telomere length. The encoded protein may also play a role in trafficking of cellular cargo from the endosome to the trans-Golgi network. Mutations in this gene may be associated with breast cancer in human patients. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.013274729).
BP6
Variant 7-105546926-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-105546926-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 241410.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000414 (63/152254) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00311 (15/4820). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00192. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 33 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
RINT1NM_021930.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.532T>C p.Tyr178His missense_variant 5/15 ENST00000257700.7 NP_068749.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RINT1ENST00000257700.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.532T>C p.Tyr178His missense_variant 5/151 NM_021930.6 ENSP00000257700 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000408
AC:
62
AN:
152136
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000393
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00290
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000943
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000500
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000604
AC:
144
AN:
238418
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.000676
AC XY:
87
AN XY:
128782
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000293
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00141
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00260
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000468
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000436
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000346
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000392
AC:
569
AN:
1450024
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000444
AC XY:
320
AN XY:
721052
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000611
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000269
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000865
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00271
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000188
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000226
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000534
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000414
AC:
63
AN:
152254
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000443
AC XY:
33
AN XY:
74442
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000393
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00311
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000943
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000500
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000524
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.000287
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000519
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000930
AC:
8
ExAC
AF:
0.000692
AC:
84
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000600
EpiControl
AF:
0.000830

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 29, 2024- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The RINT1 p.Y178H variant was identified in two individuals with breast cancer, as well as in one healthy control (Li_2016_PMID: 27544226; Park_2014_PMID: 25050558).  The variant was not identified in COSMIC, but it was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs139565013) and ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Invitae). The variant was identified in control databases in 155 of 269824 chromosomes (2 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.0005744 (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The p.Y178 residue is conserved in mammals however computational analyses (MUT Assesor, PolyPhen-2, SIFT, MutationTaster, Revel, FATHMM, MetaLR, DANN) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (Splice AI exome) do not predict a deleterious effect on splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 02, 2020This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.16
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.52
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.53
CADD
Benign
21
DANN
Benign
0.96
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.053
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.16
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.028
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.85
T
M_CAP
Benign
0.0040
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.013
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.8
L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.73
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.24
N
REVEL
Benign
0.046
Sift
Benign
0.52
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.51
T
Polyphen
0.0070
B
Vest4
0.39
MVP
0.28
MPC
0.25
ClinPred
0.022
T
GERP RS
5.2
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.037
gMVP
0.26

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs139565013; hg19: chr7-105187373; COSMIC: COSV105856132; COSMIC: COSV105856132; API