rs139658279

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2

The NM_024685.4(BBS10):c.765G>A(p.Met255Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00115 in 1,611,964 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00068 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

BBS10
NM_024685.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:8B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.343

Variant links:

Genes affected

BBS10 (HGNC:26291): (Bardet-Biedl syndrome 10) This gene is a member of the Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS) gene family. Bardet-Biedl syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by progressive retinal degeneration, obesity, polydactyly, renal malformation and cognitive disability. The proteins encoded by BBS gene family members are structurally diverse and the similar phenotypes exhibited by mutations in BBS gene family members is likely due to their shared roles in cilia formation and function. Many BBS proteins localize to the basal bodies, ciliary axonemes, and pericentriolar regions of cells. BBS proteins may also be involved in intracellular trafficking via microtubule-related transport. The protein encoded by this gene is likely not a ciliary protein but rather has distant sequence homology to type II chaperonins. As a molecular chaperone, this protein may affect the folding or stability of other ciliary or basal body proteins. Inhibition of this protein's expression impairs ciliogenesis in preadipocytes. Mutations in this gene cause Bardet-Biedl syndrome type 10. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2010]

BBS10 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.016797036).

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BBS10	NM_024685.4 link	c.765G>A	p.Met255Ile	missense_variant	Exon 2 of 2	ENST00000650064.2	NP_078961.3	Q8TAM1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BBS10	ENST00000650064.2 link	c.765G>A	p.Met255Ile	missense_variant	Exon 2 of 2		NM_024685.4	ENSP00000497413.1		Q8TAM1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000677

AC:

103

AN:

152128

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00137

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000598

AC:

149

AN:

249212

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000526

AC XY:

AN XY:

134922

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000677

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000434

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000305

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000960

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000654

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00119

AC:

1744

AN:

1459836

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00111

AC XY:

805

AN XY:

726316

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000388

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000403

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000186

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000408

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00143

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00136

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000677

AC:

103

AN:

152128

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000458

AC XY:

AN XY:

74304

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00137

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.00101

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000718

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00162

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00208

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000908

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000581

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000585

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.00125

EpiControl

AF:

0.000948

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:8Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:3Benign:1

Jan 18, 2016

Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 08, 2022

GeneDx

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Identified in individuals with Bardet-Biedl syndrome in published literature who were found to have an alternate molecular basis for their phenotype (Manara et al., 2019; Hjortshoj et al., 2010); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 20120035, 31196119) -

May 29, 2024

Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 19, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 10

Uncertain:3

May 26, 2017

Counsyl

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Dec 18, 2019

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Dec 26, 2024

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: BBS10 c.765G>A (p.Met255Ile) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0006 in 249212 control chromosomes (gnomAD). This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in BBS10 causing Bardet-Biedl Syndrome (0.0006 vs 0.0012), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.765G>A has been reported in the literature in heterozygous individuals affected with Bardet-Biedl Syndrome or Retinitis Pigmentosa who also had biallelic variants in other genes (Hjortshoj_2010, Manara_2019, Jespersgaard_2019). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Bardet-Biedl Syndrome. Some of the co-occurring variants are known to be pathogenic (BBS2 c.661del, p.Leu221fs; BBS1 c.1285dup, p.Arg429fs; PROM1 c.2461C>T, p.Arg821Ter), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 20120035, 31196119, 30718709). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 235677). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 1

Benign:2

May 04, 2016

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 31, 2017

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome

Uncertain:1

Nov 02, 2022

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change replaces methionine, which is neutral and non-polar, with isoleucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 255 of the BBS10 protein (p.Met255Ile). This variant is present in population databases (rs139658279, gnomAD 0.1%), and has an allele count higher than expected for a pathogenic variant. This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with Bardet-Biedl syndrome (PMID: 20120035). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 235677). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BBS10 protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

BBS10-related disorder

Benign:1

Sep 17, 2024

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.10

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.29

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.19

CADD

Benign

0.40

DANN

Benign

0.82

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.23

T;T

Eigen

Benign

-1.4

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.2

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.024

LIST_S2

Benign

0.32

.;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.013

MetaRNN

Benign

0.017

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.89

MutationAssessor

Benign

-1.8

N;N

PrimateAI

Benign

0.37

PROVEAN

Benign

0.47

N;.

REVEL

Uncertain

0.43

Sift

Benign

1.0

T;.

Sift4G

Benign

1.0

T;.

Polyphen

0.0

B;B

Vest4

0.12

MutPred

0.70

Gain of catalytic residue at R256 (P = 0.001);Gain of catalytic residue at R256 (P = 0.001);

MVP

0.42

MPC

0.063

ClinPred

0.0021

GERP RS

-1.2

Varity_R

0.067

gMVP

0.16

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over