rs139779505
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 2P and 16B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.5131G>A(p.Val1711Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000201 in 1,612,958 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V1711L) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000548.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSC2 | NM_000548.5 | c.5131G>A | p.Val1711Met | missense_variant | 40/42 | ENST00000219476.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSC2 | ENST00000219476.9 | c.5131G>A | p.Val1711Met | missense_variant | 40/42 | 5 | NM_000548.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000519 AC: 79AN: 152226Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000240 AC: 60AN: 250396Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000243 AC XY: 33AN XY: 135706
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000168 AC: 246AN: 1460614Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000179 AC XY: 130AN XY: 726638
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000519 AC: 79AN: 152344Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000524 AC XY: 39AN XY: 74490
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Oct 22, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jul 27, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Aug 30, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Sep 19, 2016 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 03, 2019 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21984974, 22903760, 24631838, 27176796, 22558107, 28088512, 23514105) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2022 | TSC2: BS1, BS2 - |
Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Nov 07, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 27, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jul 31, 2020 | - - |
Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | curation | Tuberous sclerosis database (TSC2) | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at