rs139791325
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 4P and 1B. PM1PM2BP4
The NM_000527.5(LDLR):c.1876G>A(p.Glu626Lys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000268 in 1,613,958 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: đť‘“ 0.00022 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes đť‘“: 0.00027 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
LDLR
NM_000527.5 missense
NM_000527.5 missense
Scores
3
7
8
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.79
Genes affected
LDLR (HGNC:6547): (low density lipoprotein receptor) The low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene family consists of cell surface proteins involved in receptor-mediated endocytosis of specific ligands. The encoded protein is normally bound at the cell membrane, where it binds low density lipoprotein/cholesterol and is taken into the cell. Lysosomes release the cholesterol, which is made available for repression of microsomal enzyme 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase, the rate-limiting step in cholesterol synthesis. At the same time, a reciprocal stimulation of cholesterol ester synthesis takes place. Mutations in this gene cause the autosomal dominant disorder, familial hypercholesterolemia. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants.[provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.
PM1
?
In a hotspot region, there are 11 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 1 benign, 11 uncertain in NM_000527.5
PM2
?
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.33752286).
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDLR | NM_000527.5 | c.1876G>A | p.Glu626Lys | missense_variant | 13/18 | ENST00000558518.6 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDLR | ENST00000558518.6 | c.1876G>A | p.Glu626Lys | missense_variant | 13/18 | 1 | NM_000527.5 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000217 AC: 33AN: 152140Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
33
AN:
152140
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000314 AC: 79AN: 251492Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000324 AC XY: 44AN XY: 135920
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
79
AN:
251492
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
44
AN XY:
135920
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000274 AC: 400AN: 1461818Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000263 AC XY: 191AN XY: 727210
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
400
AN:
1461818
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
191
AN XY:
727210
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000217 AC: 33AN: 152140Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000242 AC XY: 18AN XY: 74320
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
33
AN:
152140
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
74320
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
0
ExAC
?
AF:
AC:
59
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:2Uncertain:12Benign:1Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Hypercholesterolemia, familial, 1 Pathogenic:2Uncertain:5Benign:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | U4M - Lille University & CHRU Lille, Université de Lille - CHRU de Lille | Jan 31, 2024 | This missense variant LDLR:c.1876G>A (also known as p.Glu605Lys in the mature protein), replaces a glutamic acid with lysine at codon 626 of the LDLR protein (p.Glu626Lys). According to updated genomic data and to ClinGen FH VCEP criteria issued in 2022 (PMID: 34906454) for the validation of pathogenicity of LDLR variants, this variant may now be classified as “Pathogenic" with low penetrance from evidence as follows. It is located within a highly conserved motif of a functional domain (LDLR Class B6) essential for LDL binding and LDLR recycling to the plasma membrane. Despite being previously classified as VUS according to standard ACMG criteria and found as VUS in multiple records in ClinVar, recent in-vitro studies (PMID: 35568682) have reclassified this variant as “Pathogenic” based on level 1 functional tests showing significantly reduced LDL binding and internalization (PS3-strong) and cosegregation found with FH in at least 6 informative meioses (PP1-Strong). In addition, this variant was observed in the context of genetic testing in a patient exhibiting a phenotype (Dutch Lipid Clinic Network Scoring=11) of definite FH (PP4), and is now borderline to meeting criteria PM2 (GnomAD= 0.000217 (<0.0002) and no homozygotes) and PP3 (REVEL Score= 0,71, ≥0,75). Studies mentioning this variant as likely benign performed as part of screening studies before 2013, and discordant observations suggesting VUS in previous CLinGen reports, are in favor of a lowered penetrance for this variant. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Jul 30, 2015 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | This missense variant replaces glutamic acid with lysine at codon 626 of the LDLR protein. This variant is also known as p.Glu605Lys in the mature protein. This variant alters a conserved glutamic acid residue in the LDLR type B repeat 6 of the LDLR protein (a.a. 616-658), where pathogenic missense variants are found enriched (ClinVar-LDLR). Computational prediction tools indicate that this variant has a deleterious impact on protein structure and function. Functional studies have shown that this variant causes a decrease in LDLR internalization, uptake and activity (PMID: 35568682, 37719435); a different high-throughput cell-based assay was inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on the LDLR function (PMID: 25647241). This variant has been reported in several individuals affected with familial hypercholesterolemia (PMID: 16250003, 20828696, 27596133, 35474963, 37848354). Two of these individuals also carried a different pathogenic LDLR missense variant (PMID: 27596133). In a large myocardial infarction case-control study conducted in Europe and North America, this variant was reported in 4/3726 cases and 3/3668 controls, showing inconclusive association with disease (PMID: 25487149). This variant has been identified in 83/282896 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Cardiovascular Genetics Laboratory, PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA - Fiona Stanley Hospital | May 25, 2011 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Laboratory of Genetics and Molecular Cardiology, University of SĂŁo Paulo | Mar 01, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Cardiovascular Research Group, Instituto Nacional de Saude Doutor Ricardo Jorge | Mar 01, 2016 | 0/200 non-FH alleles - |
Likely benign, flagged submission | literature only | LDLR-LOVD, British Heart Foundation | Mar 25, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Feb 19, 2019 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
not specified Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Feb 03, 2017 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: This variant is present in HGMD in 3 papers but in cases and controls. It is classified in ClinVar with 1 star as Likely benign by British Heart Foundation, VUS by CHOP and Instituto Nacional de Saude Doutor Ricardo Jorge and Pathogenic by PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA - Fiona Stanley Hospital (in 2011). It has a max MAF in ExAC of 0.08% (56 alleles) and in gnomAD of 0.06% (75 alleles). - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 04, 2022 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Nov 14, 2022 | Variant summary: LDLR c.1876G>A (p.Glu626Lys) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00032 in 253384 control chromosomes (gnomAD and Do_2015), predominantly at a frequency of 0.00062 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in LDLR causing Familial Hypercholesterolemia (0.00032 vs 0.0013), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.1876G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Familial Hypercholesterolemia and has been reported to segregate within disease, however it has also been reported in the compound heterozygous state in individuals with a pathogenic variant (e.g. Fouchier_2005, Medeiros_2014, Thormaehlen_2015, Benito-Vicente_2015, Do_2015, Grenkowitz_2016,Futema_2021, Graca_2022). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Familial Hypercholesterolemia. At least two publications report experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, however the results indicate the effect is unclear (e.g. Thormaehlen_2015, Graca_2022). The variant was found to have normal expression and ligand binding levels, but showed reduced cellular internalization, approximately 60% of the WT protein, suggesting it may impact function (Graca_2022). Eleven submitters have provided clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 with conflicting assessments. The majority classified the variant as VUS (n=9), one classified it as likely pathogenic, and one as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. - |
Familial hypercholesterolemia Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 07, 2023 | This missense variant replaces glutamic acid with lysine at codon 626 of the LDLR protein. This variant is also known as p.Glu605Lys in the mature protein. This variant alters a conserved glutamic acid residue in the LDLR type B repeat 6 of the LDLR protein (a.a. 616-658), where pathogenic missense variants are found enriched (ClinVar-LDLR). Computational prediction tools indicate that this variant has a deleterious impact on protein structure and function. Functional studies have shown that this variant causes a decrease in LDLR internalization, uptake and activity (PMID: 35568682, 37719435); a different high-throughput cell-based assay was inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on the LDLR function (PMID: 25647241). This variant has been reported in several individuals affected with familial hypercholesterolemia (PMID: 16250003, 20828696, 27596133, 35474963, 37848354). Two of these individuals also carried a different pathogenic LDLR missense variant (PMID: 27596133). In a large myocardial infarction case-control study conducted in Europe and North America, this variant was reported in 4/3726 cases and 3/3668 controls, showing inconclusive association with disease (PMID: 25487149). This variant has been identified in 83/282896 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Oct 03, 2022 | This sequence change replaces glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, with lysine, which is basic and polar, at codon 626 of the LDLR protein (p.Glu626Lys). This variant is present in population databases (rs139791325, gnomAD 0.06%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with hypercholesterolemia and myocardial infarction (PMID: 16250003, 20828696, 25487149, 25647241). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 183127). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) has been performed at Invitae for this missense variant, however the output from this modeling did not meet the statistical confidence thresholds required to predict the impact of this variant on LDLR protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 06, 2021 | The p.E626K variant (also known as c.1876G>A), located in coding exon 13 of the LDLR gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 1876. The glutamic acid at codon 626 is replaced by lysine, an amino acid with similar properties. This variant has been reported in family hypercholesterolemia (FH), myocardial infarction, and coronary artery disease cohorts; however, it has also been reported in individuals with normal LDL-C levels (Fouchier SW et al. Hum Mutat, 2005 Dec;26:550-6; Medeiros AM et al. J Lipid Res, 2014 May;55:947-55; Thormaehlen AS et al. PLoS Genet, 2015 Feb;11:e1004855; Do R et al. Nature, 2015 Feb;518:102-6; Grenkowitz T et al. Atherosclerosis, 2016 10;253:88-93; Benedek P et al. J Intern Med, 2018 12;284:674-684). Based on data from gnomAD, the frequency for this variant is above the maximum credible frequency for a disease-causing variant in this gene based on internally established thresholds (Karczewski et al. Nature. 2020 May;581(7809):434-443; Whiffin et al. Genet Med. 2017 10;19:1151-1158). This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is conflicting at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
not provided Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | in vitro | Dept. of Genetics and Pharmacogenomics, Merck Research Labs | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
Cadd
Uncertain
Dann
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
D;.;.;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
L;.;.;.;.;L
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D;D
Sift
Benign
T;T;T;D;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
P;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at