rs139802143

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001123385.2(BCOR):c.408C>T(p.Ala136Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000467 in 1,208,860 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. There are 151 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0024 ( 1 hom., 75 hem., cov: 22)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00027 ( 2 hom. 76 hem. )

Consequence

BCOR
NM_001123385.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.175

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

BCOR (HGNC:20893): (BCL6 corepressor) The protein encoded by this gene was identified as an interacting corepressor of BCL6, a POZ/zinc finger transcription repressor that is required for germinal center formation and may influence apoptosis. This protein selectively interacts with the POZ domain of BCL6, but not with eight other POZ proteins. Specific class I and II histone deacetylases (HDACs) have been shown to interact with this protein, which suggests a possible link between the two classes of HDACs. Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. A pseudogene of this gene is found on chromosome Y.[provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]

BCOR Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

microphthalmia, syndromic 2
Inheritance: XL, Unknown Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Illumina, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
microphthalmia, Lenz type
Inheritance: XL Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

BCOR links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.77).

BP6

Variant X-40074938-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-40074938-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 210521.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.175 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00242 (268/110710) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00848 (258/30430). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00763. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 75 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 22. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Hemizygotes in GnomAd4 at 75 XL,Unknown gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BCOR	NM_001123385.2 link	c.408C>T	p.Ala136Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 15	ENST00000378444.9	NP_001116857.1	Q6W2J9-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BCOR	ENST00000378444.9 link	c.408C>T	p.Ala136Ala	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 15	1	NM_001123385.2	ENSP00000367705.4		Q6W2J9-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00242

AC:

268

AN:

110657

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00850

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000667

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000189

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00135

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000730

AC:

134

AN:

183444

AF XY:

0.000619

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00950

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000255

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000270

AC:

296

AN:

1098150

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000209

AC XY:

AN XY:

363506

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00939

AC:

248

AN:

26400

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000256

AC:

AN:

35206

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

19386

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000662

AC:

AN:

30206

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000111

AC:

AN:

54140

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000740

AC:

AN:

40522

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000242

AC:

AN:

4136

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000594

AC:

AN:

842063

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000477

AC:

AN:

46091

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.475

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00242

AC:

268

AN:

110710

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00228

AC XY:

AN XY:

32948

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00848

AC:

258

AN:

30430

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000667

AC:

AN:

10501

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2635

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3520

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2514

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5915

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

215

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000189

AC:

AN:

52791

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00133

AC:

AN:

1504

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.512

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00135

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00287

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Oct 08, 2014

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

History of neurodevelopmental disorder

Benign:1

Nov 01, 2011

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Oculofaciocardiodental syndrome

Benign:1

Nov 18, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.77

CADD

Benign

0.15

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.59

PhyloP100

0.17

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism (auto)

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over