rs139872140
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_001386795.1(DTNA):c.1297C>T(p.His433Tyr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00228 in 1,613,756 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0020 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0023 ( 6 hom. )
Consequence
DTNA
NM_001386795.1 missense
NM_001386795.1 missense
Scores
6
7
6
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 7.15
Genes affected
DTNA (HGNC:3057): (dystrobrevin alpha) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the dystrobrevin subfamily of the dystrophin family. This protein is a component of the dystrophin-associated protein complex (DPC), which consists of dystrophin and several integral and peripheral membrane proteins, including dystroglycans, sarcoglycans, syntrophins and alpha- and beta-dystrobrevin. The DPC localizes to the sarcolemma and its disruption is associated with various forms of muscular dystrophy. Mutations in this gene are associated with left ventricular noncompaction with congenital heart defects. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.06422153).
BP6
Variant 18-34838788-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr18-34838788-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 46431.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=2}. Variant chr18-34838788-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 309 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTNA | NM_001386795.1 | c.1297C>T | p.His433Tyr | missense_variant | 13/23 | ENST00000444659.6 | NP_001373724.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTNA | ENST00000444659.6 | c.1297C>T | p.His433Tyr | missense_variant | 13/23 | 5 | NM_001386795.1 | ENSP00000405819.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00203 AC: 309AN: 152102Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
309
AN:
152102
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00143 AC: 360AN: 251370Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00146 AC XY: 199AN XY: 135854
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
360
AN:
251370
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
199
AN XY:
135854
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00231 AC: 3372AN: 1461536Hom.: 6 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00219 AC XY: 1589AN XY: 727064
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
3372
AN:
1461536
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
1589
AN XY:
727064
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00203 AC: 309AN: 152220Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00196 AC XY: 146AN XY: 74442
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
309
AN:
152220
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
146
AN XY:
74442
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
14
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
6
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
3
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
24
ExAC
AF:
AC:
157
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jun 01, 2024 | DTNA: BS1, BS2 - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jun 24, 2013 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | May 26, 2015 | p.His403Tyr in exon 12C of DTNA: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 0.2% (137/66688) of European chrom osomes and 0.1% (12/11538) of Latino chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consor tium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org/; dbSNP rs139872140). - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 01, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 29, 2018 | Variant summary: DTNA c.1216C>T (p.His406Tyr) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0014 in 277106 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The observed variant frequency is approximately 57-folds higher than the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in DTNA causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (2.5e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.1216C>T in individuals affected with Cardiomyopathy and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Left ventricular noncompaction 1 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 19, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Jul 24, 2020 | The DTNA c.1216C>T; p.His406Tyr variant (rs139872140), to our knowledge, is not reported in the medical literature but is reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 46431). This variant is found in the non-Finnish European population with an overall allele frequency of 0.23% (297/129112 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database. While this population frequency may be inconsistent with disease, the prevalence of left ventricular non-compaction in the general population is disputed and may be higher than expected (Ross 2020). The histidine at codon 406 is moderately conserved, and computational analyses (SIFT, PolyPhen-2) predict that this variant is deleterious. Due to limited information, the clinical significance of the p.His406Tyr variant is uncertain at this time. References: Ross SB et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of left ventricular non-compaction in adults. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(14):1428-1436. - |
DTNA-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Nov 01, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
.;D;D;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
D;D;.;D
M_CAP
Benign
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
.;M;M;.
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
D
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Uncertain
D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D;D;D
Polyphen
D;D;D;.
Vest4
MVP
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at