rs139977567

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2_Supporting

The NM_001048174.2(MUTYH):​c.264+11G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000529 in 1,614,156 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00066 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00052 ( 11 hom. )

Consequence

MUTYH
NM_001048174.2 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.33
Variant links:
Genes affected
MUTYH (HGNC:7527): (mutY DNA glycosylase) This gene encodes a DNA glycosylase involved in oxidative DNA damage repair. The enzyme excises adenine bases from the DNA backbone at sites where adenine is inappropriately paired with guanine, cytosine, or 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine, a major oxidatively damaged DNA lesion. The protein is localized to the nucleus and mitochondria. This gene product is thought to play a role in signaling apoptosis by the introduction of single-strand breaks following oxidative damage. Mutations in this gene result in heritable predisposition to colorectal cancer, termed MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP). Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).
BP6
Variant 1-45333402-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-45333402-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 138309.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-45333402-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000663 (101/152334) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0189 (98/5182). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0159. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 58 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 11 AR geneVariant has number of homozygotes lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MUTYHNM_001048174.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.264+11G>A intron_variant ENST00000456914.7
MUTYHNM_001128425.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.348+11G>A intron_variant ENST00000710952.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MUTYHENST00000456914.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.264+11G>A intron_variant 1 NM_001048174.2 A1Q9UIF7-6
MUTYHENST00000710952.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.348+11G>A intron_variant NM_001128425.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000677
AC:
103
AN:
152218
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0191
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00171
AC:
430
AN:
251454
Hom.:
9
AF XY:
0.00164
AC XY:
223
AN XY:
135900
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0229
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000980
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000352
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000326
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000515
AC:
753
AN:
1461822
Hom.:
11
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.000494
AC XY:
359
AN XY:
727220
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0167
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000927
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000468
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000464
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000663
AC:
101
AN:
152334
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000779
AC XY:
58
AN XY:
74498
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0189
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000127
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000869
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00173
AC:
6
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesAug 10, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 14, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Familial adenomatous polyposis 2 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The MUTYH c.348+11G>A variant was identified in 1 of 110 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from individuals or families with lung cancer (Shinmura 2001). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs139977567) as With Uncertain significance allele, ClinVar (classified as benign by GeneDx; classified as uncertain significance by Illumina), Clinvitae, Insight Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database, databases. The variant was not identified in UMD-LSDB database. The variant was identified in control databases in 445 (8 homozygous) of 277170 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0016 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMay 03, 2016- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.85
CADD
Benign
0.032
DANN
Benign
0.79

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.060
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs139977567; hg19: chr1-45799074; API